Moody v. State

842 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2003) · Supreme Court of Florida · January 23, 2003 · No. SC94435

Summary

The Supreme Court of Florida held that the traffic stop of Darryl Moody was unlawful because the officer's information about Moody's suspended driver's license was stale and did not support reasonable suspicion. The court also rejected independent-source, inevitable-discovery, and attenuation exceptions to the exclusionary rule. It reversed the order denying the motion to suppress, vacated the judgment and death sentence, and remanded for a new trial.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Anstead, C.J.; Pariente, J.; Lewis, J.; Quince, J.; Shaw, Senior Justice
Jurisdiction
Florida
Decision date
January 23, 2003
Docket number
SC94435
Procedural posture
Direct appeal from a judgment and sentence finding Moody guilty of felony murder and imposing the death penalty.
Standard of review
Historical facts underlying a suppression ruling receive a presumption of correctness, but mixed questions of law and fact that determine Fourth Amendment issues are reviewed independently.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida; precedential.
Parties
Darryl Moody v. State of Florida
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

suppression of evidencefourth amendmentsearch and seizureexclusionary rulecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureconstitutional lawevidenceappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the traffic stop was supported by a reasonable and articulable suspicion when the officer's information about Moody's driver's-license status was one to three years old.
  2. Whether evidence obtained directly or indirectly from the stop was admissible under an exception to the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine.
  3. Whether the judgment of conviction and death sentence should stand after reversal of the suppression ruling.

Holdings

  1. The traffic stop was unlawful because the officer's information concerning Moody's driver's-license status was stale and therefore amounted only to a hunch or mere suspicion, not a reasonable suspicion supporting an investigatory stop.
  2. The evidence obtained as a result of the unlawful stop was subject to suppression because the State failed to establish an independent source, inevitable discovery, or sufficient attenuation.

Key quotations

When, as in this case, as many as three years passes without any further information about a person's driving status, and when, as in this case, that person's license can be restored through a simple administrative process, the staleness of the officer's information is indeed an important factor in considering the totality of the circumstances showing an objective manifestation to justify the stop. (759)
The illegal stop and Moody's initial arrest set in motion an unbroken chain of events, which included the discovery of the P-380, Moody's sale of the Rossi .38 to Foster, a second arrest for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, Foster's attempt to help get Moody out of jail for the second arrest by turning in the Rossi .38 to police, and the search of the several residences. (760)

Factual background

Police stopped Moody after an officer recognized him and suspected that his driver's license remained suspended based primarily on information the officer had obtained one to three years earlier. During an inventory search of Moody's vehicle, police found a Davis P-380 handgun linked to a stolen Buick at the scene of a murder; subsequent events led to discovery of a Rossi .38 murder weapon and additional evidence. Moody was convicted of felony murder and sentenced to death, with the State relying substantially on evidence derived from the stop.

Procedural history

The trial court denied Moody's motions to suppress evidence obtained following a traffic stop, and Moody was convicted of felony murder and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed the suppression ruling and the resulting judgment and sentence. Because it reversed the suppression ruling, it did not decide Moody's remaining appellate claims.

Remand instructions

Reverse the order denying the motion to suppress, vacate the judgment and sentence, suppress the fruits of the unlawful stop unless an applicable exception is established, and conduct a new trial consistent with the opinion.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…