Bolin v. State

41 So. 3d 151 (Fla. 2010) · Supreme Court of Florida · July 1, 2010 · No. SC08-1963

Summary

The Supreme Court of Florida affirmed the denial of Oscar Ray Bolin, Jr.'s motion for postconviction relief from his conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder. The court rejected his ineffective-assistance claims concerning counsel's failure to object to lay testimony about blood and failure to call his father as a rebuttal witness, concluding that counsel's decisions were reasonable trial strategy and that Bolin failed to establish prejudice.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the Court
Canady, C.J.; Pariente, J.; Lewis, J.; Polston, J.; Labarga, J.; Perry, J.
Jurisdiction
Florida
Decision date
July 1, 2010
Docket number
SC08-1963
Procedural posture
Appeal from an order denying a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 motion to vacate a first-degree murder conviction and death sentence.
Standard of review
The court defers to circuit-court factual findings supported by competent, substantial evidence and reviews legal conclusions de novo. Ineffective-assistance claims require satisfaction of both the deficient-performance and prejudice prongs of Strickland.
Precedential value
Published decision of the Supreme Court of Florida; precedential.
Parties
Oscar Ray Bolin, Jr. v. State of Florida
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

post-conviction reliefineffective assistanceevidencecriminal proceduresentencing

Practice areas

criminal post-conviction reliefcapital litigationineffective assistance of counselevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to Danny Ferns's lay testimony that he saw blood or what appeared to be blood on the ground.
  2. Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call Oscar Ray Bolin, Sr., as a rebuttal witness concerning spray paint and the absence of hoses from the property.

Holdings

  1. Counsel was not ineffective because Ferns's testimony was permissible lay opinion under section 90.701, Florida Statutes, and Bolin failed to establish deficient performance or prejudice.
  2. Counsel was not ineffective for declining to call Bolin Sr. because the decision was a reasonable tactical choice concerning credibility and trial strategy, and Bolin failed to establish prejudice.
  3. An ineffective-assistance claim requires proof that counsel's performance fell outside the broad range of reasonably competent performance and that the deficiency prejudiced the fairness and reliability of the proceeding.

Key quotations

Because both prongs of the Strickland test present mixed questions of law and fact, this Court employs a mixed standard of review, deferring to the circuit court's factual findings that are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but reviewing the circuit court's legal conclusions de novo. (155)
There is a strong presumption that trial counsel's performance was not ineffective. (155)
A lay witness may give opinion testimony so long as the opinion testimony does not mislead the trier of fact. (158)

Factual background

Teri Lynn Matthews was found murdered in rural Pasco County in December 1986. At Bolin's third trial, his half-brother testified that Bolin enlisted him to move Matthews's sheet-wrapped body and struck it with a metal-tipped stick; another witness, Danny Ferns, testified that he saw what appeared to be blood on the ground. Bolin claimed counsel was ineffective for failing to object to Ferns's testimony and for failing to call Bolin's father, who allegedly could have testified that red spray paint, rather than blood, was present on the property.

Procedural history

Bolin was convicted and sentenced to death three times for the murder of Teri Lynn Matthews; the first two convictions were reversed on direct appeal for evidentiary and voir dire errors. After the third conviction and death sentence were affirmed, Bolin filed a postconviction motion raising several claims, including ineffective assistance of counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing, the Sixth Circuit Court in and for Pasco County denied the remaining claims. Bolin appealed, pursuing claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to lay testimony concerning blood and for failing to call his father as a rebuttal witness.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…