In re Amendments to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules

252 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 2018) · Supreme Court of Florida · August 30, 2018 · No. SC17-1362

Summary

The Supreme Court of Florida repealed amendments to Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules 6 and 20 that purported to authorize Commission panels to designate filings with the Court as confidential. The Court held that the amendments exceeded the Commission’s authority and were inconsistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the constitutional right of access to judicial branch records.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Canady, C.J.; Pariente, J.; Quince, J.; Polston, J.; Labarga, J.; Lawson, J.; Lewis, J.
Jurisdiction
Florida
Decision date
August 30, 2018
Docket number
SC17-1362
Procedural posture
Original proceeding in which the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission submitted amendments to its rules for review by the Supreme Court of Florida.
Precedential value
Published Florida Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission
Disposition
other

Topics

constitutional lawrulemakingadministrative lawappellate procedurejudicial review of agency action

Practice areas

constitutional lawadministrative lawjudicial administrationpublic records and access

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission had constitutional or rule-based authority to authorize its investigative and hearing panels to designate filings with the Supreme Court confidential.
  2. Whether the confidentiality amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 were consistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the public-access provisions of the Florida Constitution.

Holdings

  1. The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission and its panels lack authority to designate filings with the Supreme Court confidential through JQC rules.
  2. Filings in JQC proceedings before the Supreme Court may be designated and maintained as confidential only through the procedures and substantive provisions of Rule 2.420; sensitive personal information alone does not permit the Commission to designate a filing confidential.
  3. After an investigative panel finds probable cause and files formal charges with the Supreme Court Clerk, subsequent JQC and Supreme Court proceedings and related records are public unless confidentiality is established under Rule 2.420.

Key quotations

However, this Court must repeal the confidentiality amendments because neither the Commission nor its panels have authority to designate filings in this Court confidential under rule 2.420 or the Florida Constitution, and the Commission does not have authority to adopt a rule of procedure purporting to grant such authority. (-4-)
Accordingly, this Court repeals the amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 that purport to authorize the Commission’s panels to designate filings with this Court confidential. (-8-)

Factual background

The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission adopted amendments to Rules 6 and 20 that permitted its investigative and hearing panels to designate filings with the Supreme Court, or portions of those filings, as confidential. The Commission stated that the amendments were intended to protect sensitive medical and personal information in proceedings involving judicial disability or illness. After reviewing the amendments and the Commission's responses and revisions, the Supreme Court determined that the amendments exceeded the Commission's authority and conflicted with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420.

Procedural history

The Commission submitted amendments to JQC Rules 6 and 20 authorizing investigative and hearing panels to designate filings with the Supreme Court confidential. The Supreme Court ordered the Commission to explain why the amendments should not be repealed, requested clarification, considered revised amendments, and repealed the confidentiality amendments.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…