Greene v. State, 274 Ga. 220

552 S.E.2d 834 (2001) · Supreme Court of Georgia · September 17, 2001 · No. S01A1048

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Melvin Greene Sr.'s convictions for felony murder and aggravated assault arising from a fatal stabbing. The court held that the evidence was sufficient, that evidence of Greene's prior aggravated-assault conviction was properly admitted as a similar transaction, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motions for continuance.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Hunstein, Justice
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
September 17, 2001
Docket number
S01A1048
Procedural posture
Greene appealed his convictions for felony murder and aggravated assault and his life sentence after the Supreme Court of Georgia docketed the appeal and submitted it for decision on the briefs.
Standard of review
Sufficiency of the evidence was reviewed under whether a rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Admission of similar-transaction evidence and rulings on motions for continuance were reviewed for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Georgia; binding precedent in Georgia.
Parties
Melvin Greene, Sr. v. State of Georgia
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureevidenceself defenseappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureevidenceappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Greene's felony-murder conviction.
  2. Whether evidence of Greene's 1989 aggravated-assault conviction was admissible as similar-transaction evidence to show intent, bent of mind, and course of conduct.
  3. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying a continuance to allow Greene to obtain new counsel.
  4. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying a continuance to permit Greene to review records from his 1989 conviction and obtain the victim's criminal history.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find Greene guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  2. The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of Greene's 1989 aggravated-assault conviction because the prior incident was sufficiently similar to the charged stabbing and tended to prove Greene's intent, bent of mind, and course of conduct.
  3. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a continuance to allow Greene to obtain new counsel.
  4. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Greene's motion for a continuance to review the 1989 conviction records and obtain the victim's criminal history.

Key quotations

Evidence of similar transactions may be admitted if there is sufficient evidence that the accused committed the offense or act and that there is a sufficient connection or similarity between the offense and the crime charged, so that "proof of the former tends to prove the latter." (552 S.E.2d at 835)
Greene's conduct and choice of action were nearly identical in both instances and he was convicted in the previous incident, thereby establishing that Greene committed the previous act. (552 S.E.2d at 836)

Factual background

On September 25, 1999, Greene and Leroy Bryant, Jr. became involved in an altercation outside a convenience store after verbal provocation. Although Greene's friends urged him to leave and offered to buy him another beer, Greene threw rocks at Bryant, crossed the street, and resumed the fight. After Bryant struck Greene with a stick, Greene lunged at Bryant with a knife and fatally stabbed him in the heart. The State also introduced evidence of Greene's 1989 aggravated-assault conviction arising from a similar knife attack after verbal provocation.

Procedural history

Greene was indicted in Floyd County on felony murder, aggravated assault, voluntary manslaughter, and recidivism charges. After a February 2001 trial, he was convicted of felony murder and aggravated assault and sentenced to life imprisonment for felony murder; the aggravated assault conviction merged into the felony murder conviction as a matter of law. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…