Georgia State Licensing Board for Residential & General Contractors v. Allen, 286 Ga. 811

692 S.E.2d 343 (2010) · Supreme Court of Georgia · March 25, 2010 · No. No. S09A1831

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed a venue challenge and a preliminary injunction concerning enforcement of Georgia's statewide licensing requirements for residential and general contractors. The court affirmed denial of the motion to dismiss or transfer venue, but reversed the preliminary injunction, holding that the alleged failure to provide notice did not justify injunctive relief and that the injunction improperly disrupted enforcement of the licensing law. Three justices dissented from the reversal of the preliminary injunction.

Holdings

  1. Venue was proper in Muscogee County because the complaint sought substantial equitable relief against both the Board and the resident County in common, including preliminary and permanent injunctions against enforcement of the licensing law.
  2. The preliminary injunction was improper because the alleged failure to post notice under OCGA § 43-41-14(b) did not justify enjoining enforcement of the licensing law, and the plaintiffs had not shown irreparable injury or that they would be without an adequate remedy.
  3. An interlocutory injunction should preserve the parties' status quo pending final adjudication and should be refused when it would operate oppressively on defendants, particularly where denial would not cause irreparable injury or leave the plaintiff without an adequate remedy.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether venue was proper in Muscogee County for the equitable action against the State Licensing Board when the County, a resident defendant, was also subject to substantial equitable relief sought in common with the Board.
  2. Whether the superior court properly granted a preliminary injunction based on alleged failure to provide notice of the examination exemption and the resulting inability of contractors to obtain statewide licenses.
  3. Whether the statutory posting requirement in OCGA § 43-41-14(b) required counties to post notice of the time-limited examination exemption opportunity.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Hoffman v. Dept. of Corrections, 218 Ga.App. 363, 460 S.E.2d 882 (1995)(cited)
  • Agri-Cycle LLC v. Couch, 284 Ga. 90, 91(1), 663 S.E.2d 175 (2008)(cited)
  • Bloodworth v. Bloodworth, 225 Ga. 379, 385(1)(b), 169 S.E.2d 150 (1969)(cited)
  • I. Perlis & Sons v. Nat. Surety Corp., 218 Ga. 667, 668, 129 S.E.2d 915 (1963)(cited)
  • Shaheen v. Dunaway Drug Stores, 246 Ga. 790, 791, 273 S.E.2d 158 (1980)(cited)
  • Madray v. Ogden, 225 Ga. 806, 809, 171 S.E.2d 560 (1969)(cited)
  • Hamilton v. Renewed Hope, Inc., 277 Ga. 465, 467, 589 S.E.2d 81 (2003)(cited)
  • City Council of St. Mary's v. Crump, 251 Ga. 594, 595(2), 308 S.E.2d 180 (1983)(cited)
  • American Lien Fund v. Dixon, 286 Ga. 562, 690 S.E.2d 415 (2010)(cited)
  • Bailey v. Buck, 266 Ga. 405(1), 467 S.E.2d 554 (1996)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…