In re Vickers

291 Ga. 354 (2012) · Supreme Court of Georgia · July 2, 2012

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia disbarred Marcus L. Vickers after he was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States and mail and wire fraud arising from his work as a real estate closing attorney. Although the Court recognized mitigating factors, it concluded that the felonies involved dishonesty, occurred in the practice of law, and facilitated mortgage fraud, making disbarment appropriate.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Per curiam
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
July 2, 2012
Procedural posture
Attorney-discipline proceeding concerning the appropriate sanction following Vickers's federal felony convictions. A special master recommended a three-year suspension with reinstatement conditions; the Review Panel recommended disbarment, and the Supreme Court reviewed the matter.
Standard of review
The Court reviewed the record and the parties' arguments to determine the appropriate disciplinary sanction.
Precedential value
Published opinion; precedential Georgia Supreme Court decision.
Parties
State Bar of Georgia v. Marcus L. Vickers
Disposition
other

Topics

real estateremedies

Practice areas

attorney disciplineprofessional responsibilityreal estate fraudmortgage fraud

Questions Presented

  1. What disciplinary sanction is appropriate for an attorney convicted of three felonies arising from his practice of law in violation of Bar Rule 8.4 (a) (2)?
  2. Whether mitigating circumstances warranted a suspension rather than disbarment.

Holdings

  1. Disbarment is the appropriate discipline for Vickers's three felony convictions and related misconduct, notwithstanding the mitigating circumstances.

Key quotations

As this Court has often stated, the primary purpose of the disciplinary system “is to protect the public from attorneys who are not qualified to practice law due to incompetence or unprofessional conduct,” (291 Ga. at 354)
mortgage fraud is and has been a very serious problem in Georgia and . . . real estate closing attorneys are relied on by their lender clients and by the public to act ethically and lawfully to identify and prevent such fraud, rather than facilitating and concealing it. (291 Ga. at 355)

Factual background

Vickers, a Georgia attorney and closing attorney or closing agent for two condominium sales, was convicted of conspiring to misrepresent to lenders that borrowers had made down payments and of conspiring to distribute closing proceeds contrary to the HUD statements provided to the lenders. He was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States and two counts of mail or wire fraud and received a federal prison sentence, supervised release, and restitution obligation. The misconduct occurred in the practice of law, involved dishonesty toward a client, and at least facilitated mortgage fraud.

Procedural history

Vickers was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia of conspiracy to defraud the United States and two counts of mail or wire fraud arising from condominium closings. The Supreme Court of Georgia had previously suspended him pending appeal. After the appeal failed, a special master held a show-cause hearing and recommended a three-year suspension, but the State Bar objected and the Review Panel concluded that disbarment was appropriate. The Supreme Court agreed with the Review Panel and removed Vickers's name from the rolls of Georgia attorneys.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…