In re Richards

296 Ga. 441 (2015) · Supreme Court of Georgia · January 20, 2015

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia granted Charles Houston Richards, Jr.’s application for certification of fitness for readmission to the Georgia Bar. The court found that he had satisfied the procedural requirements, demonstrated rehabilitation and remorse, and reimbursed the Client Security Fund, while conditioning reinstatement on satisfaction of remaining requirements, including passing the Georgia Bar Examination.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Per curiam
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
January 20, 2015
Procedural posture
Respondent Charles Houston Richards, Jr. applied for certification of fitness for readmission to the Georgia Bar after disbarment. The Fitness Board recommended certification, and the Supreme Court of Georgia made the final determination under the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in Georgia.
Standard of review
The Court independently made the final determination regarding certification of fitness and required clear and convincing evidence that Richards was fit to practice law.
Precedential value
Published Georgia Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Disposition
other

Topics

administrative lawagency adjudicationappellate procedure

Practice areas

bar admission and reinstatementprofessional disciplineadministrative law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Richards demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he was fit to practice law and therefore entitled to certification for readmission.
  2. Whether Richards satisfied the procedural requirements for certification under Part A, Section 10 of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in Georgia.

Holdings

  1. Richards demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he was fit to practice law in Georgia and was entitled to certification of fitness for readmission.
  2. Richards met the procedural requirements of Part A, Section 10 of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in Georgia.

Key quotations

We are convinced of his candor, credibility, and rehabilitation, and conclude that Richards has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he is entitled to be certified as fit to practice law in Georgia. (443)
Accordingly, this Court hereby grants Richards’ application for certification of fitness and orders that, upon satisfaction of all the requirements of Part B of the Rules, including taking and passing the Georgia Bar Examination, Richards may be reinstated as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia. (443)

Factual background

Richards was admitted to the Georgia Bar in 1991 and disbarred in 2008 after failing to respond to disciplinary notices involving mishandling client funds and insufficient trust-account funds. He documented a history of alcohol and drug abuse, expressed remorse, accepted responsibility, and presented evidence of extensive rehabilitation, community service, professional conduct, and support from personal references. The Client Security Fund confirmed that it had paid $34,292.88 on claims against him and that Richards reimbursed the Fund in full in January 2012.

Procedural history

Richards was disbarred in Georgia in 2008 after failing to respond to two Notices of Discipline. In July 2014, he filed an application for certification to practice law, supported by a statement of rehabilitation and evidence of restitution and community involvement. The Fitness Board followed the required notice and review procedures, certified him for readmission, and submitted its report and record to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which granted the application subject to satisfaction of the remaining Part B requirements, including passing the Georgia Bar Examination.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…