State v. Colvard

296 Ga. 381 (2015) · Supreme Court of Georgia · January 20, 2015 · No. S14A1347

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the suppression of physical evidence and the defendant’s confession in a murder prosecution. The court held that the defendant’s uncle lacked actual or apparent authority to consent to a warrantless search of the defendant’s locked bedroom, and that the confession was properly suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Hines, Presiding Justice
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
January 20, 2015
Docket number
S14A1347
Procedural posture
The State appealed the Fulton County Superior Court's order granting Colvard's motion to suppress physical evidence seized during a warrantless search and his confession as fruit of the poisonous tree.
Standard of review
When the trial judge hears a suppression motion as the trier of fact, factual findings supported by any evidence and credibility determinations are not disturbed unless clearly erroneous; the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the trial court's findings and judgment.
Precedential value
published precedential opinion
Parties
The State v. Antonio Colvard
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

search and seizurefourth amendmentsuppression of evidenceexclusionary rulecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureconstitutional criminal procedureevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the superior court erred in finding that Colvard's uncle lacked actual or apparent authority to consent to the warrantless search of Colvard's locked bedroom.
  2. Whether the superior court erred in suppressing Colvard's confession as fruit of the poisonous tree.

Holdings

  1. The superior court properly determined that the uncle lacked actual common authority over the locked bedroom and that the police could not reasonably have believed that he had authority to consent to entry.
  2. The superior court properly suppressed Colvard's confession and related statements as fruit of the poisonous tree because the State established no error in the finding that the statements resulted from the unlawful search.

Key quotations

the third party must have “common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected” or it must be shown that the police could have reasonably believed that the third party did have such authority. (296 Ga. at 383)
The State fails to provide any basis upon which to find error in the superior court’s resulting determination that Colvard’s confession and other information contained in his statements constitute “fruit of the poisonous tree,” and consequently, must be suppressed. (296 Ga. at 386-387)

Factual background

Colvard used a locked bedroom exclusively in his uncle's Atlanta apartment. The uncle consented to a search of the apartment's common areas, but he had no key to the locked bedroom and could not enter it when the door was locked. Police nevertheless forced the bedroom door open without a warrant and found firearms, including one apparently connected to the murder of Robert Davis; Colvard later confessed.

Procedural history

A Fulton County grand jury indicted Colvard on murder and related charges. After a suppression hearing, the superior court found that Colvard's uncle lacked actual or apparent authority to consent to entry into Colvard's locked bedroom and suppressed firearms discovered there; the court also suppressed Colvard's confession as derived from the unlawful search. The State appealed, and the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…