Summary
The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed an interlocutory injunction requiring the City of Waycross to continue providing water and sewer services to property in Pierce County that had been de-annexed by legislation. The court held that the County and intervening customers presented sufficient evidence of irreparable harm, the balance of equities, a substantial likelihood of success, and the public interest, and that the service-delivery agreement could plausibly require continued service. The court also rejected challenges based on standing, municipal management discretion, constitutional limits on extraterritorial services, and alleged procedural defects.
Holdings
- The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction to preserve the status quo while the merits were litigated.
- Pierce County and the intervening customers had standing to seek injunctive relief against suspension of the City's water and sewer services.
- The City's procedural objections lacked merit because the trial court held a hearing at which the City was permitted to raise and argue the objections before allowing the counterclaim and intervention to proceed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting Pierce County an interlocutory injunction requiring Waycross to continue providing water and sewer services to the de-annexed area.
- Whether the County and intervening customers had standing to seek injunctive relief.
- Whether the amended counterclaim was an impermissible after-acquired counterclaim and whether the trial court improperly allowed intervention without a prior opportunity for the City to be heard.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (16)
- Parker v. West View Cemetery Assn., 195 Ga. 237, 242-243 (24 SE2d 29) (1943)(followed)
- Chambers v. Peach County, 268 Ga. 672, 673 (492 SE2d 191) (1997)(followed)
- Christopher J. McFadden et al., Georgia Appellate Practice with Forms, § 6-16, pp. 205-206 (2008)(followed)
- Bishop v. Patton, 288 Ga. 600, 604-605 (706 SE2d 634) (2011)(followed)
- SRB Investment Svcs., LLLP v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., 289 Ga. 1, 5 n. 7 (709 SE2d 267) (2011)(followed)
- Garden Hills Civic Assn. v. MARTA, 273 Ga. 280, 281 (539 SE2d 811) (2000)(followed)
- Bernocchi v. Forcucci, 279 Ga. 460, 461 (614 SE2d 775) (2005)(followed)
- Dooley v. Dun & Bradstreet Software Svcs., 225 Ga. App. 63, 65 (483 SE2d 308) (1997)(followed)
- Unified Govt. of Athens-Clarke County v. Stiles Apartments, Inc., 290 Ga. 740, 742 (723 SE2d 681) (2012)(followed)
- Kirkland v. Johnson, 209 Ga. 824 (76 SE2d 396) (1953)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.