Kellam v. State

298 Ga. 520 (2016) · Supreme Court of Georgia · February 22, 2016 · No. S15A1913

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Jaworski Dune Kellam’s convictions for malice murder and cruelty to children arising from the fatal blunt-force injuries inflicted on a seventeen-month-old child. The court held that the evidence was legally sufficient and that the trial court properly refused to instruct the jury on accident and involuntary manslaughter because those defenses were not supported by the evidence.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Benham, Justice
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
February 22, 2016
Docket number
S15A1913
Procedural posture
Kellam appealed his convictions for malice murder and cruelty to children after the Supreme Court of Georgia granted his motion for an out-of-time appeal. He challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on accident and involuntary manslaughter.
Standard of review
The court independently examined the record for legal sufficiency under Jackson v. Virginia. Whether the evidence authorized a jury instruction on accident or involuntary manslaughter was treated as a question of law.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Georgia; binding precedent within Georgia.
Parties
Jaworski Dune Kellam v. The State
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

jury instructionscriminal procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate practice

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support Kellam's convictions for malice murder and cruelty to children.
  2. Whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of accident.
  3. Whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on involuntary manslaughter based on the commission of a lawful act in an unlawful manner.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was legally sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Kellam fatally injured the child and was guilty of malice murder and cruelty to children.
  2. The trial court properly refused to give an accident instruction because the evidence did not reasonably raise that defense.
  3. The trial court properly refused to instruct the jury on involuntary manslaughter based on the commission of a lawful act in an unlawful manner.

Key quotations

Since accident was not reasonably raised by the evidence, the trial court did not err by failing to give a charge on that defense. (at 523)
[Appellant’s] conduct, as related by him, comes so plainly within the definition of the crime of ‘reckless conduct’ that it cannot qualify as a ‘lawful act.’ (at 529-530)

Factual background

Kellam was caring for seventeen-month-old A’Trevia Davis after her mother left the child with him. Kellam told witnesses that he had played with the child by throwing or bouncing her on a bed, later found her unresponsive, and sought help. Medical evidence showed severe blunt-force abdominal trauma, internal bleeding, and injuries inconsistent with CPR, a fall from the bed, or the described playful bouncing.

Procedural history

A Laurens County grand jury indicted Kellam for malice murder, felony murder predicated on cruelty to children, and cruelty to children. Following a 2007 jury trial, he was convicted on all counts; the felony-murder conviction was vacated as a matter of law, and he received life without parole for malice murder and a concurrent twenty-year sentence for cruelty to children. The trial court denied his motion for new trial in 2009 and later granted an out-of-time appeal in 2014. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…