Brewer v. State

301 Ga. 819 (2017) · Supreme Court of Georgia · August 28, 2017

Summary

The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Erwin Trevor Brewer’s convictions for malice murder and related crimes arising from the shooting death of Larry Strickland. The court held that Brewer waived any challenge to the denial of a mistrial by declining a curative instruction, that counsel’s decision not to request the instruction was not ineffective assistance, and that any error in excluding evidence of the victim’s alleged prior violent act was harmless.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
Melton, Presiding Justice; All Justices
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
August 28, 2017
Procedural posture
Brewer appealed his convictions for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime after the trial court denied his motion for new trial.
Standard of review
Denial of a mistrial based on improper admission of bad-character evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Ineffective-assistance claims are reviewed by accepting the trial court's factual findings and credibility determinations unless clearly erroneous while independently applying legal principles. The sufficiency of the evidence is reviewed under Jackson v. Virginia. Evidentiary error is subject to harmless-error review.
Precedential value
Published opinion; precedential authority of the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Parties
Erwin Trevor Brewer v. State
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureineffective assistanceself defenseevidenceharmless error

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate litigationevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Brewer's motion for mistrial after a witness referred to jail booking information.
  2. Whether Brewer waived his challenge to the denial of a mistrial by declining the trial court's proposed curative instruction.
  3. Whether trial counsel was ineffective for declining the curative instruction.
  4. Whether the trial court committed reversible error by excluding Brewer's testimony concerning an alleged prior act of violence by the victim.
  5. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Brewer's convictions.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to find Brewer guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  2. The trial court properly denied the motion for mistrial because Brewer waived the issue by declining the offered curative instruction, and, even if preserved, the denial was not an abuse of discretion.
  3. Brewer did not receive ineffective assistance because counsel's decision to decline the curative instruction was a reasonable strategic choice and Brewer failed to establish deficient performance.
  4. Any error in excluding Brewer's testimony about the victim's alleged prior violent act was harmless and did not warrant reversal.

Key quotations

Trial tactics and strategy . . . are almost never adequate grounds for finding trial counsel ineffective unless they are so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen them. (821)
Considering the trial record as a whole, we conclude that it is highly probable that any erroneous evidentiary ruling by the trial court with regard to [the alleged unrelated criminal activity by Strickland] did not contribute to the jury’s verdict. (822)

Factual background

Brewer borrowed money from his cousin, Larry Strickland, and became angry when Strickland later asked for repayment. Brewer grabbed a handgun, pursued Strickland outside, shot him fatally, took money from Strickland's pocket, and fled. Brewer claimed self-defense, but eyewitnesses testified that Strickland was unarmed and that Brewer initiated the attack. During trial, a police officer referred to using jail booking information to locate Brewer, and the trial court offered but Brewer declined a curative instruction.

Procedural history

Brewer was indicted in Troup County in February 2014 and convicted by a jury after trial. The trial court sentenced him as a recidivist to life imprisonment without parole for malice murder and five consecutive years for possession of a firearm; the felony-murder conviction was vacated by operation of law and aggravated assault merged for sentencing. The trial court denied Brewer's amended motion for new trial on January 27, 2016, and Brewer timely appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…