Agee v. State

S21A0372 · Supreme Court of Georgia · April 19, 2021 · No. S21A0372

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Derrick Agee’s convictions for malice murder and related offenses arising from a nightclub shooting. The court held that the evidence, including prior inconsistent statements by recanting witnesses and corroborating circumstances, was sufficient, and that Agee knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia
Writing for the Court
LaGrua, Justice; All the Justices
Jurisdiction
Georgia
Decision date
April 19, 2021
Docket number
S21A0372
Procedural posture
Direct appeal from convictions entered after a bench trial in Fulton County Superior Court.
Standard of review
The sufficiency of the evidence is reviewed under whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellate court does not reweigh evidence or determine witness credibility. The trial court's acceptance of a jury-trial waiver is reviewed for clear error.
Precedential value
Published Georgia Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Derrick Agee v. The State
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureevidencereasonable doubtappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate practiceevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Agee's convictions when the two eyewitnesses who had identified him in written statements later recanted or disavowed those statements at trial.
  2. Whether Agee knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his constitutional right to a jury trial.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational factfinder to find Agee guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because the factfinder was entitled to credit the witnesses' prior inconsistent written statements identifying Agee as the shooter, together with the corroborating evidence, over their trial recantations.
  2. Agee personally, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial, and the trial court did not clearly err in accepting the waiver.

Key quotations

the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime[s] beyond a reasonable doubt. (7)
The constitutional right to a jury trial may be waived only if the State proves beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant did so knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. (9)
A trial court should ask the defendant sufficient questions on the record so that the court can ensure the defendant’s waiver is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. (11-12)

Factual background

Agee attended Club Escape on December 7, 1997, where a fight involving members of his group led to security personnel removing Agee and most of his group from the club. After the club manager denied Agee a refund, Agee threatened to have the club shot up, retrieved a gun from his car, and shots were fired into the club, killing Steven Lowe and wounding Monitaaz Simmons. Two members of Agee's group later gave written statements identifying him as the shooter, although both recanted or disavowed those statements at trial. The evidence also included testimony about a car matching Agee's vehicle fleeing the scene and later being found concealed near his mother's home.

Procedural history

Agee was indicted in Fulton County in 2001 on charges arising from the 1997 shooting death of Steven Lowe and the shooting of Monitaaz Simmons. Following a February 2006 bench trial, the trial court found him guilty and imposed a life sentence for malice murder plus consecutive sentences for aggravated assault and firearm-possession offenses. The trial court denied Agee's motion for new trial in October 2019 at his request so that he could pursue an appeal. The Supreme Court of Georgia considered the appeal on the briefs and affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…