Canlas v. Lee, M.D.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · May 15, 2025 · No. CAAP-25-0000087

Summary

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii issued an order dismissing the plaintiff-appellant's appeal after he failed to pay required filing fees or obtain a fee waiver. Consequently, the record on appeal was not filed within the prescribed timeframe, leading to a default entry by the clerk. Relying on the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court dismissed the appeal for failure to prosecute and comply with procedural mandates.

Court
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Writing for the Court
Katherine G. Leonard; Keith K. Hiraoka; Sonja M.P. McCullen
Jurisdiction
Hawaii
Decision date
May 15, 2025
Docket number
CAAP-25-0000087
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Civil No. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
Precedential value
published
Parties
Guillermo M. Canlas v. Dr. Brandon W. Lee, M.D.; Dr. Worldster S. Lee, M.D.; Erin Muraoka, R.N.; Cataract and Vision Center of Hawaii; Dr. Marina A. Badua, M.D.; Dr. Marina A. Badua, M.D., Inc.; John Does 1-20; Jane Does 1-20; Doe Partnerships 1-20; Doe Corporations 1-20; Doe Non‑Profit Corporations 1-20; Doe Governmental Entities 1-20; Doe Entities 1-20
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate procedure

Practice areas

civil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an appeal may be dismissed for failure to file the record on appeal and to pay the required filing fees under Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 11(b)(2) and (c)(2).

Holdings

  1. The appeal is dismissed because the record on appeal was not prepared and the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to HRAP Rule 11(b)(2) and (c)(2).

Key quotations

An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Factual background

Guillermo Canlas, a self‑represented appellant, filed a notice of appeal on February 10, 2025 but did not pay the filing fees or secure a fee waiver. The appellate clerk entered a default for failure to docket the record, and the appellant failed to act thereafter.

Procedural history

Plaintiff‑Appellant filed a notice of appeal on February 10, 2025 but failed to pay the required filing fees or obtain a fee waiver. The record on appeal was not docketed, and the clerk entered a default on April 24, 2025. The appellant took no further action, and the court dismissed the appeal.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…