Summary
This Intermediate Court of Appeals order denies a pro se defendant's motion for reconsideration of a prior order dismissing her appeal. The court found that the defendant failed to demonstrate any overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). The order was issued by a three-judge panel on February 10, 2025.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether the appellant demonstrated a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in its amended order dismissing the appeal.
Holdings
- The motion for reconsideration is denied because the appellant failed to demonstrate any point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended.
Key quotations
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied.”
Factual background
Defendant‑Appellant Hannah Valientino, pro se, filed a Motion for Reconsideration alleging that the Court had overlooked or misapprehended a point of law or fact in its Amended Order Dismissing Appeal.
Procedural history
The State appealed a district court judgment. The District Court of the Third Circuit (Case No. 3DTI-24-203139) issued an Amended Order Dismissing Appeal on January 27, 2025. Defendant‑Appellant Hannah Valientino filed a Motion for Reconsideration on February 5, 2025, which was denied by this Court on February 10, 2025.