Summary
The Idaho Supreme Court considered an interlocutory appeal involving claims that a nonprofit corporation was liable under Idaho Code § 6-1701(4) for injury to a child arising from alleged sexual molestation at a Boy Scout camp. The court held that the statutory cause of action could apply to a corporation's own conduct, including willful conduct by its board or certain high-level agents, and that nonprofit status did not provide tort immunity. It also held that compensation did not categorically preclude a finding that the minors were in the corporation's care or custody, vacated the order denying summary judgment, and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Osborn v. Salinas did not bar the Steeds from pursuing a claim against Grand Teton Council for its own conduct constituting injury to a child under Idaho Code § 6-1701(4). The statute does not create vicarious liability for another person's abuse, but it permits liability for a defendant's own willful conduct.
- A claim under Idaho Code § 6-1701 is not a negligence per se claim, and the statute's extended limitations period applies only to actions brought under Chapter 17, Title 6, not to common-law negligence or negligence per se claims.
- A corporation may be liable for the statutory tort of injury to a child when the tort is committed by its board of directors, an agent responsible for forming corporate policy, or a high managerial agent with supervisory responsibility over the subject matter, acting within the scope of employment and possessing the required actual knowledge or intent.
- A nonprofit or charitable corporation is not immune from tort liability for compensatory or punitive damages merely because of its nonprofit or charitable status.
- Receiving compensation did not, as a matter of law, prevent the Steeds from being in Grand Teton Council's care or custody.
Questions Presented
- Whether Osborn v. Salinas barred recovery against Grand Teton Council under Idaho Code § 6-1701(4).
- Whether a corporation may be liable for the statutory tort of injury to a child under Idaho Code §§ 6-1701(4) and 18-1501.
- Whether a nonprofit corporation is immune from compensatory or punitive damages on public-policy grounds.
- Whether payment of compensation to the Steeds prevented them from being in Grand Teton Council's care or custody.
- Whether the district court's denial of Grand Teton Council's motion for summary judgment should be upheld.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (15)
- Osborn v. Salinas, 131 Idaho 456, 958 P.2d 1142 (1998)(distinguished)
- State v. Tiffany, 139 Idaho 909, 88 P.3d 728 (2004)(followed)
- Ahles v. Tabor, 136 Idaho 393, 34 P.3d 1076 (2001)(followed)
- Alegria v. Payonk, 101 Idaho 617, 619 P.2d 135 (1980)(followed)
- Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 733 P.2d 1234 (1986)(followed)
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrig. Dist., 97 Idaho 580, 548 P.2d 80 (1976)(followed)
- Stott ex rel. Dougall v. Finney, 130 Idaho 894, 950 P.2d 709 (1997)(followed)
- State v. Young, 138 Idaho 370, 64 P.3d 296 (2002)(followed)
- State v. Blake, 133 Idaho 237, 985 P.2d 117 (1999)(followed)
- State v. Adjustment Department Credit Bureau, 94 Idaho 156, 483 P.2d 687 (1971)(applied by analogy)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.