Jerry Hosteny v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission and Anning Johnson Co., 397 Ill. App. 3d 665

928 N.E.2d 474 (2009) · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Workers' Compensation Commission Division · December 29, 2009 · No. No. 1-08-3238 WC

Summary

The Illinois Appellate Court reviewed the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission’s denial of benefits for alleged neck injuries sustained by Jerry Hosteny while carrying a ladder at work. The court held that the Commission’s credibility determinations and findings that Hosteny failed to prove compensable injuries arising out of and in the course of employment were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The court affirmed the circuit court’s confirmation of the Commission’s decisions.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Workers' Compensation Commission Division
Writing for the Court
Justice Hudson; Presiding Justice McCullough; Justice Hoffman; Justice Holdridge; Justice Donovan
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
December 29, 2009
Docket number
No. 1-08-3238 WC
Procedural posture
Claimant sought judicial review of Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission decisions denying compensation for alleged work-related injuries. The circuit court of Cook County confirmed the Commission's decisions, and claimant appealed.
Standard of review
The Commission's factual determination whether an injury arose out of and in the course of employment is reviewed under the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard. The reviewing court will not reverse unless an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. No heightened or extra degree of scrutiny applies merely because the Commission rejected the arbitrator's credibility findings without taking new evidence.
Precedential value
Published Illinois appellate decision
Parties
Jerry Hosteny v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission, Anning Johnson Co.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationjudicial review of agency actionstandard of reviewadministrative lawappellate procedure

Practice areas

workers compensationadministrative lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Commission's finding that Hosteny failed to prove compensable work-related injuries on June 4 and August 2, 2004, was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
  2. Whether a reviewing court must apply an extra degree of scrutiny when the Commission rejects an arbitrator's factual or credibility findings without taking new evidence.

Holdings

  1. No. The Commission exercises original rather than appellate jurisdiction when reviewing an arbitrator's decision, is not bound by the arbitrator's findings, and the reviewing court does not apply an extra degree of scrutiny to the Commission's decision.
  2. The Commission's finding that Hosteny failed to prove compensable accidental injuries on either date was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Key quotations

In any event, as the overwhelming weight of authority cited above suggests, Cook is a misstatement of the appropriate standard of review. (483)
Based on the record before us, we cannot say that an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. (486)

Factual background

Hosteny, a journeyman painter, alleged that he injured his neck while carrying a 32-foot ladder at work on June 4 and August 2, 2004. He continued working regular duty and did not report a work-related accident to his employer or medical providers until September 2004, and contemporaneous medical records did not identify a work injury. The Commission found his testimony not credible and concluded that he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that either alleged injury arose out of and in the course of employment.

Procedural history

Hosteny filed three workers' compensation applications alleging injuries on June 4, August 2, and September 15, 2004. The arbitrator found compensable accidents on the first two dates and awarded medical expenses, temporary total disability benefits, and permanent partial disability benefits, while denying benefits for the September 15 claim. The Commission reversed the arbitrator as to the June 4 and August 2 claims, finding that Hosteny failed to prove work-related accidental injuries. The circuit court confirmed the Commission, and the Appellate Court of Illinois affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…