Summary
The Illinois Appellate Court interpreted section 5(b) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act concerning an employer’s reimbursement lien and responsibility for attorney fees and litigation costs after a third-party settlement. The court held that future workers’ compensation payments offset by the settlement qualify as benefits to the employer for purposes of calculating fees and costs. It reversed and remanded with directions concerning reimbursement, weekly payments, attorney fees, and costs.
Holdings
- A beneficiary's recovery from a third-party tortfeasor does not automatically terminate the employer's obligation to make future workers' compensation installment payments, although a court may protect the employer's right of reimbursement by crediting or offsetting the third-party recovery against those future obligations.
- For calculating the employer's responsibility for attorney fees and litigation costs, the "gross amount of such reimbursement" under section 5(b) includes both compensation already paid and compensation to be paid in the future when the third-party settlement relieves the employer of those future payments.
- After the employer's full weekly compensation obligation is terminated by the settlement, the insurer must pay weekly attorney fees of $56.10 and costs of $14.32, for a total of $70.42 per week, until the original award would expire or the plaintiff dies, whichever occurs first.
Questions Presented
- Whether the employer's obligation to make future installment payments of workers' compensation benefits automatically terminates when the beneficiary obtains a third-party tort recovery.
- Whether the term "gross amount of such reimbursement" in section 5(b) of the Illinois Workers' Compensation Act includes both workers' compensation benefits already paid and future benefits extinguished or offset by a third-party settlement for purposes of calculating the employer's responsibility for attorney fees and litigation costs.
- How attorney fees and litigation costs attributable to future workers' compensation benefits avoided by the employer should be calculated and paid.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Denius v. Robertson, 98 Ill. App. 3d 83, 87-88, 424 N.E.2d 336, 337, 339-40 (1981)(followed)
- Freer v. Hysan Corp., 108 Ill. 2d 421, 426, 484 N.E.2d 1073, 1079 (1985)(followed)
- Lewis v. Riverside Hospital, 116 Ill. App. 3d 845, 849, 851-52, 452 N.E.2d 611, 613-15 (1983)(followed)
- Jones v. Melroe Division, Clark Equipment Co., 102 Ill. App. 3d 1103, 1109-12, 430 N.E.2d 1385, 1388-90 (1981)(partially followed)
- Vandygriff v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 68 Ill. App. 3d 396, 399, 386 N.E.2d 318, 319-20 (1979)(followed)
- Williams, McCarthy, Kinley, Rudy & Picha v. Northwestern National Insurance Group, 750 F.2d 619, 620-22, 625 (7th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…