McNamara v. Shermer

157 Ill. App. 3d 864 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987) · Appellate Court of Illinois · June 17, 1987

Summary

The Illinois Appellate Court considers whether a settlement release given to a premises-liability tortfeasor also released medical-malpractice claims against a physician and hospital. Applying the Illinois Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act and Alsup v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the court holds that the defendants were not sufficiently specifically identified in the release. The court reverses the grant of summary judgment and remands for further proceedings.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Writing for the Court
Presiding Justice McNamara; Justice White; Justice Freeman
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
June 17, 1987
Procedural posture
Plaintiff appealed from an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in a medical malpractice action.
Standard of review
Summary judgment is reviewed to determine whether the pleadings and supporting materials establish that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The appellate court reviewed the legal effect and specificity of the release.
Precedential value
Published Illinois Appellate Court opinion
Parties
Thomas McNamara v. Richard Shermer, M.D., Northwest Hospital
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

medical malpracticesummary judgmentstatutory interpretationcivil proceduretorts

Practice areas

medical malpracticetortscivil procedurestatutory interpretationremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a release given to one tortfeasor under section 2(c) of the Illinois Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act releases other tortfeasors when they are not designated by name or otherwise specifically identified.
  2. Whether Rakowski v. Lucente required enforcement of the release against the medical defendants.

Holdings

  1. Under section 2(c) of the Illinois Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act, a release given to one tortfeasor does not discharge other tortfeasors unless the release specifically identifies them by name or otherwise. The general reference to 'any and all other tortfeasors who are or may be liable' did not specifically identify Dr. Shermer or Northwest Hospital, so the release did not discharge their alleged liability.
  2. Rakowski v. Lucente did not control because it concerned whether a party's release barred a later contribution claim, not whether a release specifically identified and discharged another tortfeasor's liability to the injured plaintiff.

Key quotations

The court further held that the legislature’s intendment under section 2(c) was to not release “other tortfeasors” from liability unless they were “designated by name or otherwise specifically identified.” (157 Ill. App. 3d at 865)
Alsup does hold, however, that a release does not cover a joint tortfeasor not specifically identified, and as we found above, neither defendant in the case before us was specifically identified in the release executed by plaintiff. (157 Ill. App. 3d at 867)

Factual background

McNamara fractured his left wrist in a November 27, 1983, fall at the Addison Lounge and was subsequently treated by Dr. Shermer at Northwest Hospital. On November 3, 1984, he settled with the lounge and executed a release covering the lounge and 'any and all other tortfeasors who are or may be liable' for the accident. The release also reserved the lounge's potential indemnity or contribution rights against other persons. McNamara later brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Shermer and Northwest Hospital.

Procedural history

After fracturing his wrist in a fall at the Addison Lounge, McNamara settled with and released the lounge. He then sued Dr. Shermer and Northwest Hospital for negligent medical treatment. The circuit court held that the release also discharged the medical defendants and granted summary judgment. The Appellate Court of Illinois reversed and remanded.

Remand instructions

The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion's holdings.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Illinois Appellate Court