Hooker v. Illinois State Board of Elections

2016 IL 121077 (Ill. 2016) · Illinois Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · No. 121077

Summary

The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment invalidating a proposed redistricting constitutional amendment for exceeding the scope of ballot initiatives permitted under article XIV, section 3, of the Illinois Constitution. The court addressed the initiative’s restructuring of legislative redistricting and related changes affecting other constitutional provisions. The appeal was transferred directly to the Supreme Court for prompt resolution before the 2016 general election.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
Justice Kilbride; Justice Freeman; Justice Burke; Justice Theis; Chief Justice Garman; Justice Thomas; Justice Karmeier
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
December 1, 2016
Docket number
121077
Procedural posture
Direct review by the Illinois Supreme Court, following the court's transfer of an expedited appeal from the appellate court under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 302(b).
Standard of review
De novo review applies to judgment on the pleadings and to interpretation and application of the Illinois Constitution.
Precedential value
published, precedential Illinois Supreme Court opinion
Parties
Support Independent Maps v. John Hooker et al., Illinois State Board of Elections et al.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

redistrictingelection lawconstitutional lawappellate procedureappellate jurisdiction

Practice areas

constitutional lawelection lawappellate procedureredistricting

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the proposed redistricting amendment exceeded the scope of ballot initiatives permitted by article XIV, section 3, of the Illinois Constitution because it assigned new duties to the Auditor General, whose office is governed by article VIII.
  2. Whether the circuit court properly granted plaintiffs judgment on the pleadings.
  3. Whether the proposed amendment violated the Illinois Constitution's free-and-equal-elections provision by combining separate and unrelated questions in one ballot proposition.

Holdings

  1. The proposed initiative was invalid because it assigned the Auditor General substantial new duties concerning applicant screening and commissioner selection, although the Auditor General's office and duties are subjects of article VIII rather than article IV. Those changes exceeded article XIV, section 3's limitation of ballot initiatives to structural and procedural subjects contained in article IV.
  2. Judgment on the pleadings was proper because no genuine issue of material fact existed and the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the constitutional defect.

Key quotations

The Framers of the 1970 Illinois Constitution intended article XIV, section 3, to be a very limited form of constitutional initiative. (¶ 23)
Therefore, the duties of the Auditor General have never been and are not now a “subject contained in Article IV” as currently constituted. (¶ 42)
We conclude that the duties assigned to the Auditor General by the ballot initiative at issue in this case do not comport with the strict limitations in article XIV, section 3. (¶ 44)

Factual background

Support Independent Maps submitted a petition proposing to replace Illinois's existing legislative and representative redistricting system with an independent redistricting commission. The proposed amendment assigned the Auditor General responsibility for screening applicants and selecting reviewers and commissioners, altered other governmental responsibilities, and changed the Supreme Court's redistricting jurisdiction. The State Board of Elections determined that the petition contained more than the required number of valid signatures, after which taxpayers challenged the proposal's constitutionality before it could be placed on the November 2016 ballot.

Procedural history

People's Map, John Hooker, and other Illinois taxpayers filed a taxpayer action in the Circuit Court of Cook County seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent public funds from being used to evaluate or place Support Independent Maps' redistricting initiative on the ballot. Support Independent Maps intervened. The circuit court granted plaintiffs judgment on the pleadings on counts I through VII, finding the proposed constitutional amendment invalid, and denied Support Independent Maps' cross-motion. The Illinois Supreme Court accepted direct review and affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…