American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, State Panel

216 Ill. 2d 569 (Ill. 2005) · Supreme Court of Illinois · October 6, 2005 · No. No. 99074

Summary

The Illinois Supreme Court reviewed whether the Illinois Department of Corrections was a joint employer of health-care workers employed by a private contractor at state correctional facilities. The court held that the Department was not a joint employer under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act because it lacked meaningful control over essential terms and conditions of employment. The court also declined to decide the federal preemption issue concerning potentially concurrent jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act.

Holdings

  1. The Board did not clearly err in finding that DOC was not a joint employer of Wexford's employees because DOC did not share or co-determine meaningful control over their essential terms and conditions of employment.
  2. DOC's authority to issue stop orders and enforce prison security and safety rules did not constitute control over employment for purposes of determining joint-employer status under the Illinois Labor Relations Act.
  3. Because DOC was not a joint employer under the Illinois Act, the Board properly dismissed the related unfair labor practice charge.
  4. The court declined to address the federal-preemption issue because the parties agreed that it was unnecessary to resolve the appeal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Illinois State Labor Relations Board clearly erred in determining that the Illinois Department of Corrections was not a joint employer of Wexford's bargaining-unit employees under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act.
  2. Whether DOC's contract-compliance monitoring and prison-security authority constituted sufficient control over the employees' essential terms and conditions of employment to establish joint-employer status.
  3. Whether the Board properly dismissed AFSCME's related unfair labor practice charge after determining that DOC was not the employees' employer under the Illinois Act.
  4. Whether federal labor-law preemption barred the Illinois Board from exercising jurisdiction.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (17)

  • AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security, 198 Ill. 2d 380, 390, 395 (2001)(followed)
  • Branson v. Department of Revenue, 168 Ill. 2d 247, 254 (1995)(followed)
  • City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 181 Ill. 2d 191, 204 (1998)(followed)
  • Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 289 n.19 (1982)(followed)
  • United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)(followed)
  • Village of Winfield v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 176 Ill. 2d 54, 60 (1997)(followed)
  • Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 127 Ill. 2d 453, 474-75 (1989)(followed)
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir. 1982)(followed)
  • American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 190 Ill. App. 3d 259, 264 (1989)(followed)
  • Airborne Freight Co., 338 N.L.R.B. 597, 597 n.1 (2002)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…