Summary
The Illinois Supreme Court considered whether a class-arbitration limitation in Cingular Wireless's standard service agreement was unconscionable and unenforceable. The court held that a later revision to Cingular's arbitration provision did not apply to the plaintiff's already-terminated agreement and rejected Cingular's federal preemption arguments. The opinion addresses arbitration agreements, class-action waivers, contract modification, unconscionability, and the Federal Arbitration Act.
Holdings
- Cingular could not unilaterally modify the arbitration provision after Kinkel had terminated the service agreement. The unconscionability analysis therefore had to focus on the original arbitration clause.
- The FAA did not expressly or impliedly preempt an Illinois-law determination that the class-action waiver was unconscionable, so long as the state-law analysis applied generally applicable contract principles and did not treat arbitration clauses differently merely because they involved arbitration.
- Under the circumstances of this case, the class-action waiver was unconscionable and unenforceable.
- Class-action waivers are not per se unconscionable; their enforceability must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances.
- The unconscionable class-action waiver was severable from the remainder of the arbitration clause, which remained enforceable.
Questions Presented
- Whether Cingular's 2003 revised arbitration provision could be applied to Kinkel's claim after she had terminated her service agreement.
- Whether the Federal Arbitration Act expressly or impliedly preempted an Illinois-law determination that the class-action waiver was unconscionable.
- Whether the class-action waiver in the original arbitration provision was unconscionable under generally applicable Illinois contract law.
- Whether the unconscionable class-action waiver was severable from the remainder of the arbitration clause.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (45)
- Ellman v. Ianni, 21 Ill. App. 2d 353, 361 (1959)(distinguished)
- Livingston v. Associates Finance, Inc., 339 F.3d 553, 557 (7th Cir. 2003)(distinguished)
- Kristian v. Comcast Corp., 446 F.3d 25, 30 (1st Cir. 2006)(distinguished)
- Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 317 F.3d 646, 676-77 (6th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Spinetti v. Service Corp. International, 324 F.3d 212, 217 n.2, 219 (3d Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Perry v. Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 489-92 & n.9 (1987)(followed)
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 (1983)(followed)
- Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1984)(followed)
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681, 683, 686 (1996)(followed)
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265, 281 (1995)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 45.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…