People v. Williams, 239 Ill. 2d 503

942 N.E.2d 1257 (Ill. 2011) · Supreme Court of Illinois · January 21, 2011 · No. No. 109361

Summary

The Supreme Court of Illinois held that the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Illinois Department of Corrections is counted as a day of sentence rather than as presentence custody credit. The court affirmed the appellate court's correction of the mittimus to award Michael Williams 287 days of presentence credit, concluding that the sentencing date must be counted once, but only once, under the applicable statutory scheme.

Court
Supreme Court of Illinois
Writing for the Court
Justice Garman; Chief Justice Kilbride; Justice Freeman; Justice Thomas; Justice Karmeier; Justice Burke; Justice Theis
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
January 21, 2011
Docket number
No. 109361
Procedural posture
After a bench-trial conviction and sentencing in the circuit court of Cook County, the Illinois Appellate Court held that the day of sentencing should not be included in presentence custody credit and corrected the mittimus to award 287 days. The Illinois Supreme Court granted Williams's petition for leave to appeal to decide whether the sentencing and commitment date should be counted as presentence credit.
Standard of review
De novo review because the issue presented was one of statutory interpretation.
Precedential value
Published Illinois Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Michael Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingcriminal procedurestatutory interpretation

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal proceduresentencing

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the date on which a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Illinois Department of Corrections is counted as presentence custody credit by the circuit court or as the first day of the sentence by the Department.
  2. Whether sections 5-4.5-100 and 5-8-5 of the Unified Code of Corrections require the sentencing and commitment date to be excluded from presentence credit.

Holdings

  1. When a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department of Corrections and the mittimus issues, that date is the first day of the sentence and must not be counted as presentence custody credit by the circuit court.
  2. Section 110-14(a) did not require a different result because it was part of a separate code and was not at issue in the case.

Key quotations

For the reasons stated above, we hold that the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit. (942 N.E.2d at 1262)
Because a defendant is entitled to have the day counted once, but only once, we hold that the date of the issuance should therefore not be counted as a day of presentence custody under section 5-4.5-100(b). (942 N.E.2d at 1261)

Factual background

Michael Williams was convicted after a bench trial of being an armed habitual criminal and sentenced to six years in the Illinois Department of Corrections. He was arrested on June 14, 2007, remained in custody until sentencing on March 27, 2008, and was committed to the Department on that date when the mittimus issued. The circuit court awarded 248 days of presentence credit, and the dispute concerned whether the sentencing and commitment date should also be included.

Procedural history

Williams was convicted of being an armed habitual criminal and sentenced to six years in the Illinois Department of Corrections. The circuit court awarded 248 days of presentence credit, while Williams argued for 288 days, including the sentencing date. The appellate court awarded 287 days, excluding that date from presentence credit, and the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…