People v. Wilmington

2013 IL 112938 (Ill. 2013) · Supreme Court of Illinois · March 14, 2013 · No. 112938

Summary

The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed Lamar Wilmington’s convictions for first degree murder and concealment of a homicidal death. The court held that a defendant has no personal right to decide whether counsel tenders a lesser-included-offense instruction, and that the trial court’s noncompliance with Illinois Supreme Court Rule 431(b) did not warrant reversal under plain-error review because the evidence was not closely balanced and no biased jury was shown.

Court
Supreme Court of Illinois
Writing for the Court
Justice Karmeier; Chief Justice Kilbride; Justice Thomas; Justice Garman; Justice Theis; Justice Burke; Justice Freeman
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Decision date
March 14, 2013
Docket number
112938
Procedural posture
After a jury convicted defendant of first degree murder and concealment of a homicidal death and the circuit court imposed consecutive sentences, the appellate court initially reversed for a Rule 431(b) violation. The Illinois Supreme Court issued a supervisory order directing reconsideration in light of People v. Thompson. On remand, the appellate court affirmed, and the Illinois Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and affirmed.
Standard of review
The Rule 431(b) compliance and plain-error questions were reviewed de novo. Unpreserved errors were reviewed under Illinois's two-prong plain-error doctrine.
Precedential value
Published precedential opinion of the Illinois Supreme Court
Parties
Lamar Wilmington v. The People of the State of Illinois
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

lesser included offense instructionsjury instructionscriminal procedureappellate procedurepreservation of error

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate practice

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court's failure to fully question prospective jurors about the Rule 431(b) principles constituted plain error requiring reversal.
  2. Whether a defendant must personally consent to a defense-tendered instruction on second degree murder and whether the circuit court erred by failing to make that inquiry.
  3. Whether the evidence was closely balanced so that the Rule 431(b) violation required reversal under the first prong of plain-error review.

Holdings

  1. The circuit court violated Rule 431(b) by failing to ask prospective jurors whether they understood and accepted all four enumerated principles, including the principle that defendant's failure to testify could not be held against him.
  2. The Rule 431(b) violation did not require reversal because defendant failed to establish either that the evidence was closely balanced or that the violation resulted in a biased jury or otherwise affected the fairness and integrity of the judicial process.
  3. A defendant's personal right to decide whether to submit a lesser-included-offense instruction does not extend to a second degree murder instruction because second degree murder is a lesser-mitigated offense, not a lesser-included offense, of first degree murder.

Key quotations

the trial court’s failure to ask jurors if they understood the four Rule 431(b) principles is error in and of itself. (¶ 32)
Second degree murder is not a lesser-included offense of first degree murder; rather, it is more accurately described as a lesser-mitigated offense of first degree murder. (¶ 48)

Factual background

Guan McWilliams was found shot twice in the head and placed in a garbage can in Chicago. Lamar Wilmington voluntarily contacted police, initially falsely implicating another person, and later gave an inculpatory statement describing an argument with McWilliams, the shooting, and disposal of the body. Physical evidence, including the location of the body and injuries consistent with dragging and dropping, corroborated material portions of the statement, although defendant's experts challenged the confession and asserted that defendant's mental limitations and seizure disorder made the State's account less likely.

Procedural history

The Circuit Court of Cook County denied defendant's motion to quash his arrest and suppress evidence, including his confession. Following trial, defendant was convicted and sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 50 years for first degree murder and 5 years for concealment of a homicidal death. The appellate court ultimately affirmed after reconsideration, and the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed while rejecting part of the appellate court's reasoning.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…