Joseph Wysocki and M. Carmen Wysocki v. Barbara A. Johnson and William T. Johnson, both Individually and as Trustees of the Barbara A. Johnson Living Trust dated 12-17-1996

No. 45S03-1407-CT-459 · Indiana Supreme Court · October 15, 2014 · No. 45S03-1407-CT-459

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a judgment awarding compensatory damages to homebuyers based on common-law fraudulent misrepresentation but denying attorney fees, costs, and exemplary damages under Indiana’s Crime Victims Relief Act. The Court held that a trial court may choose common-law tort liability over quasi-criminal CVRA liability when plaintiffs plead alternative theories of recovery. It also clarified that CVRA liability does not require criminal charges or a conviction and requires proof of the predicate offense by a preponderance of the evidence.

Holdings

  1. When a complaint pleads common-law tort liability and CVRA liability as alternative theories, the trial court has discretion to impose ordinary tort liability while declining to impose quasi-criminal CVRA liability, even if the facts could support the predicate criminal offense.
  2. A CVRA claimant need not show that the defendant was criminally charged or convicted and need only prove each element of the underlying criminal offense by a preponderance of the evidence.
  3. A knowing misrepresentation on a residential real estate disclosure form does not automatically require CVRA liability; the trial court may decline CVRA relief when the plaintiff pleads alternative theories and the court elects to impose common-law tort liability instead.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a trial court has discretion to award compensatory damages for common-law fraudulent misrepresentation while declining to impose quasi-criminal liability, attorney fees, costs, and exemplary damages under the Crime Victims Relief Act when the complaint pleads alternative theories of relief.
  2. Whether a CVRA claim requires a criminal charge or conviction, or proof beyond a reasonable doubt, before civil recovery may be awarded.
  3. Whether a knowing misrepresentation on a residential real estate disclosure form automatically requires CVRA liability.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Johnson v. Wysocki, 990 N.E.2d 456, 460-61, 465-67 (Ind. 2013)(followed)
  • Wysocki v. Johnson, 4 N.E.3d 1218, 1222-23 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014)(disapproved in part)
  • Vanderwier v. Baker, 937 N.E.2d 396, 400-01 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010)(followed)
  • Marion Cnty. Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLC, 964 N.E.2d 213, 216 (Ind. 2012)(followed)
  • Stonger v. Sorrell, 776 N.E.2d 353, 358 (Ind. 2002)(followed)
  • Woodruff v. Ind. Family & Soc. Servs. Admin., 964 N.E.2d 784, 790 (Ind. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 233 (2012)(followed)
  • Browning v. Walters, 616 N.E.2d 1040, 1045-46 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993), adhered to on reh'g, 620 N.E.2d 28 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993)(followed)
  • White v. Ind. Realty Assocs. II, 555 N.E.2d 454, 456, 458 (Ind. 1990)(followed)
  • Schrenger v. Caesars Ind., 825 N.E.2d 879, 884 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied(followed)
  • Ballard v. Harman, 737 N.E.2d 411, 418 n.5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…