In the Matter of M.S. (Minor Child in Need of Services); A.C. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services

Matter of M.S. · Indiana Supreme Court · February 20, 2020 · No. 19S-JC-505

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court considered whether the statutory 120-day deadline for completing a factfinding hearing in a CHINS proceeding may be extended under Indiana Trial Rule 53.5. The Court held that the deadline may be enlarged when a party establishes good cause for a continuance, distinguishing the statutory provisions governing the initial sixty-day period and the additional sixty-day extension. Because the mother demonstrated good cause based on a discovery dispute and extensive video evidence, the Court affirmed denial of her motion to dismiss.

Holdings

  1. Indiana Trial Rule 53.5 permits a party to obtain a continuance beyond the 120-day CHINS factfinding deadline in Indiana Code section 31-34-11-1(b) when the party establishes good cause.
  2. The trial court did not err in denying Mother's motion to dismiss because Mother established good cause for the continuance that extended factfinding beyond 120 days.
  3. The appeal was not moot because CHINS adjudications have legal implications that may continue beyond the particular proceeding and may be relevant in future CHINS proceedings.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Indiana Trial Rule 53.5 permits a party to obtain a good-cause continuance that extends CHINS factfinding beyond the 120-day period in Indiana Code section 31-34-11-1(b).
  2. Whether the trial court was required to dismiss the CHINS petition because factfinding was completed after the 120-day statutory period.
  3. Whether the appeal was moot because M.S. had subsequently been reunified with Mother.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (21)

  • Matter of M.S., 124 N.E.3d 1234 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019)(vacated)
  • Matter of T.T., 110 N.E.3d 441 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)(distinguished)
  • Matter of J.R., 98 N.E.3d 652 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018)(distinguished)
  • Parmeter v. Cass Cnty. Dep't of Child Servs., 878 N.E.2d 444, 448 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)(limited)
  • In re K.D., 962 N.E.2d 1249, 1253, 1258 (Ind. 2012)(followed)
  • Matter of Eq.W., 124 N.E.3d 1201, 1209-10, 1211 (Ind. 2019)(followed)
  • In re Adoption of B.C.H., 22 N.E.3d 580, 584 (Ind. 2014)(followed)
  • Gardiner v. State, 928 N.E.2d 194, 196 (Ind. 2010)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. State, 129 N.E.3d 789, 793 (Ind. 2019)(followed)
  • Nicoson v. State, 938 N.E.2d 660, 663 (Ind. 2010)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…