Kole v. Faultless

963 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. 2012) · Supreme Court of Indiana · March 15, 2012 · No. No. 94S00-1112-CQ-692

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court answered a certified question concerning whether political subdivisions may reorganize into a city under Indiana's Government Modernization Act while adopting a nontraditional structure. The court held that the Act permits a reorganization plan providing for an at-large city council and a mayor appointed by that council, notwithstanding statutes governing the usual structure of a second-class city. The court emphasized the Act's broad grant of authority and liberal construction provisions.

Holdings

  1. Article 1.5 of Title 36, the Government Modernization Act, permits a political subdivision to reorganize into a city even when the reorganization plan provides for a city council elected entirely at large and a city mayor appointed by the city council.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a political subdivision may reorganize into a city under Indiana Code Article 36-1.5 in a manner that eliminates voting rights otherwise recognized under Indiana Code sections 36-4-5-2 and 36-4-6-3(i).
  2. Whether the Government Modernization Act permits a reorganization plan creating a city with a council elected entirely at large and a mayor appointed by that council.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Tippecanoe Cnty. v. Ind. Mfrs. Ass'n, 784 N.E.2d 463, 465 (Ind. 2003)(followed)
  • City of S. Bend v. Chicago, S.B. & N.I. Ry. Co., 179 Ind. 455, 458, 101 N.E. 628, 629 (Ind. 1913)(historical_background)
  • Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of Crown Point, 146 Ind. 421, 45 N.E. 587 (1896)(historical_background)
  • City of Gary ex rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 801 N.E.2d 1222 (Ind. 2003)(followed)
  • Snyder v. King, 958 N.E.2d 764 (Ind. 2011)(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…