Summary
The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaiʻi granted the appellee's motion to dismiss an interlocutory appeal arising from an order granting in part and denying in part a motion for contempt sanctions. The court concluded that the district court's order was not appealable as a collateral order or under the Forgay doctrine, and that the district court had not granted leave for an interlocutory appeal.
Holdings
- The order was not an appealable collateral order because it did not require Quiane to pay a specific amount by a specific day.
- The order was not appealable under the Forgay doctrine.
- The appeal could not proceed as an interlocutory appeal because the district court did not grant leave for an interlocutory appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court's order granting in part and denying in part a motion for contempt sanctions was an appealable collateral order.
- Whether the order was appealable under the Forgay doctrine.
- Whether the appeal could proceed as an interlocutory appeal under HRS § 641-1(b) without leave from the district court.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Siangco v. Kasadate, 77 Hawaiʻi 157, 161-62, 883 P.2d 78, 82 (1994)(followed)
- Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawaiʻi 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…