Harvey v. Care Initiatives, Inc.

634 N.W.2d 681 (Iowa 2001) · Supreme Court of Iowa · October 10, 2001 · No. No. 99-1074

Summary

The Iowa Supreme Court held that an independent contractor has no tort cause of action for retaliatory termination under Iowa public policy based on reporting alleged violations at a health care facility. The court concluded that Iowa Code section 135C.46 protects residents and employees, but not independent contractors, and affirmed summary judgment for Care Initiatives, Inc.

Holdings

  1. An independent contractor has no Iowa tort action for retaliatory termination of a contract under the allegations presented.
  2. The public policy expressed in Iowa Code section 135C.46 does not protect independent contractors because the statute limits its anti-retaliation protection to a resident or an employee of the facility.
  3. The district court properly granted summary judgment to Care Initiatives.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Iowa's tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy extends to independent contractors.
  2. Whether Iowa Code sections 135C.37 and 135C.46 establish a clear public policy protecting an independent contractor from retaliatory termination for reporting an alleged violation at a health-care facility.
  3. Whether summary judgment was properly granted to Care Initiatives.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (23)

  • American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co., 562 N.W.2d 159, 163 (Iowa 1997)(followed)
  • Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chem., Inc., 613 N.W.2d 275, 281-84 (Iowa 2000)(followed)
  • Springer v. Weeks & Leo Co., 429 N.W.2d 558, 560-61 (Iowa 1988)(followed)
  • Jones v. Lake Park Care Ctr., Inc., 569 N.W.2d 369, 377 (Iowa 1997)(followed)
  • Driveaway & Truckaway Serv., Inc. v. Aaron Driveaway & Truckaway Co., 781 F. Supp. 548, 551-52 (N.D. Ill. 1991)(persuasive)
  • Sistare-Meyer v. YMCA, 58 Cal. App. 4th 10, 67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 840, 842, 844 (1997)(persuasive)
  • Ostrander v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 123 Idaho 650, 851 P.2d 946, 947 (1993)(persuasive)
  • New Horizons Elecs. Mktg., Inc. v. Clarion Corp., 203 Ill. App. 3d 332, 149 Ill. Dec. 5, 561 N.E.2d 283, 285-87 (1990)(persuasive)
  • Wilmington v. Harvest Ins. Cos., 521 N.E.2d 953, 956 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988)(persuasive)
  • MacDougall v. Weichert, 144 N.J. 380, 677 A.2d 162, 166 (1996)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…