Lamberts v. Lillig

670 N.W.2d 129 (Iowa 2003) · Supreme Court of Iowa · October 8, 2003 · No. No. 02-0435

Summary

The Iowa Supreme Court held that Iowa Code section 598.35(3), authorizing grandparent visitation when the deceased parent of the child was the grandparent's child, was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause. The court also held that a handwritten mediation document providing for visitation was unenforceable because the parent had not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived constitutional parental rights. The court affirmed the district court's ruling.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa
Writing for the Court
Cady, Justice
Jurisdiction
Iowa
Decision date
October 8, 2003
Docket number
No. 02-0435
Procedural posture
Grandparents appealed the district court's denial of their petition for grandparent visitation and its determination that a mediation document purporting to provide visitation was unenforceable.
Standard of review
The constitutionality of the grandparent-visitation statute was reviewed de novo, with an independent evaluation of the totality of the circumstances. Contract construction and interpretation were reviewed as matters of law, and the question whether a party contractually waived a constitutional right was also reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
Published precedential opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa
Parties
Arnis and Lucille Lamberts v. John Lillig
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

grandparent rightssubstantive due processstrict scrutinycontract interpretationappellate procedure

Practice areas

family lawconstitutional lawcontractsappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Iowa Code section 598.35(3), authorizing court-ordered grandparent visitation when the parent who is the grandparent's child has died, violates the Due Process Clause.
  2. Whether the handwritten mediation document constituted an enforceable contract granting the grandparents visitation or a valid waiver of the parent's constitutional parental rights.

Holdings

  1. Iowa Code section 598.35(3) is unconstitutional because it permits state-ordered grandparent visitation over a fit parent's objection without the safeguards required to narrowly tailor an infringement of the parent's fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and control of the children.
  2. The mediation document was unenforceable because, even assuming it constituted a contract, John did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his constitutional parental rights by signing it.

Key quotations

The overarching principle in our analyses of the grandparent visitation statute is that a parent's "interest in the care, custody, and control of [his] children" is "perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by" the United States Supreme Court. (670 N.W.2d at 132)
Iowa Code section 598.35(3) is similarly deficient. For this reason, it too "fails to comport with the Due Process Clause on its face," making it unconstitutional. (670 N.W.2d at 133)
We believe these standards permit a proper analysis of a potential contractual waiver of constitutional rights and apply them to this case and our examination of the mediation document. (670 N.W.2d at 134)

Factual background

Arnis and Lucille Lamberts were the maternal grandparents of Robert and Alexis, whose mother died from complications arising from Alexis's birth. After the mother's death, the grandparents initially had extensive contact with John Lillig and the children, but visitation declined as John resumed an independent life and later married Amie. The grandparents petitioned for visitation, and during court-ordered mediation the adults signed a handwritten document providing limited visitation, although the mediation was informal and neither party was represented by counsel.

Procedural history

The Lamberts petitioned for grandparent visitation under Iowa Code section 598.35(3) after their daughter died. The district court granted temporary visitation, held a trial, ordered mediation, and later denied permanent visitation after concluding that subsection (3) was unconstitutional under Santi. The district court also found the mediation document unenforceable for lack of a meeting of the minds. The Supreme Court of Iowa affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…