State of Iowa v. Trent D. Smith

No. 13-1202 (Iowa May 5, 2016) (amended) · Supreme Court of Iowa · March 4, 2016 · No. No. 13-1202

Summary

The Iowa Supreme Court reviewed whether a domestic-abuse victim's statements identifying her assailant to an emergency-room nurse and doctor were admissible under Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.803(4), the medical diagnosis or treatment exception to the hearsay rule. The court held that the State failed to establish that the perpetrator's identity was reasonably pertinent to the victim's diagnosis or treatment, and therefore the statements were improperly admitted. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the court of appeals' decision, reversed the district court judgment, and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Statements identifying the perpetrator of domestic abuse are not categorically admissible under the medical-diagnosis-and-treatment exception. The proponent must establish, in each case, both that the declarant's motive was consistent with promoting medical treatment and that the identity of the perpetrator was reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.
  2. The State failed to establish sufficient foundation for admitting M.D.'s statements identifying Smith under rule 5.803(4).
  3. The erroneous admission of the medical providers' testimony concerning M.D.'s identification of Smith was prejudicial and required reversal and a new trial.
  4. The court declined to decide whether the medical statements could be admitted under the excited-utterance exception because the State did not raise that ground in the district court or on appeal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the victim's statements identifying Smith as the assailant were admissible under Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.803(4) as statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court should decide on appeal whether the statements were admissible under the excited-utterance exception when the State did not assert that ground in the district court or on appeal.
  3. Whether the erroneous admission of the medical statements was prejudicial and required a new trial.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (25)

  • State v. Guerrero Cordero, 861 N.W.2d 253, 258 (Iowa 2015)(applied)
  • State v. Paredes, 775 N.W.2d 554, 560 (Iowa 2009)(applied)
  • State v. Dullard, 668 N.W.2d 585, 589 (Iowa 2003)(applied)
  • DeVoss v. State, 648 N.W.2d 56, 62 (Iowa 2002)(applied and limited)
  • State v. Tracy, 482 N.W.2d 675, 681-82 (Iowa 1992)(applied)
  • State v. Tornquist, 600 N.W.2d 301, 304 (Iowa 1999)(followed in part)
  • State v. DeCamp, 622 N.W.2d 290, 293 (Iowa 2001)(recognized)
  • State v. Hildreth, 582 N.W.2d 167, 169-70 (Iowa 1998)(distinguished and limited)
  • State v. Long, 628 N.W.2d 440, 443-44 (Iowa 2001)(applied)
  • State v. Dudley, 856 N.W.2d 668, 676 (Iowa 2014)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 25.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…