Summary
The Iowa Supreme Court considered whether an insurance appraisal panel could determine the factual cause of hail damage to roofing shingles. The court held that appraisers may determine factual causation and the amount of loss, while courts decide coverage and policy-exclusion questions. The court vacated the court of appeals decision and remanded for further proceedings concerning preexisting shingle damage excluded under the policy.
Holdings
- Appraisers may determine the factual cause of damage to insured property when determining the amount of loss attributable to a storm, but they may not decide legal coverage questions or the applicability of policy exclusions.
- The district court erred by independently finding that the hailstorm caused no shingle damage and by disregarding the appraisal award's determination of the dollar amount of hail damage.
- The appraisal award is binding as to the dollar amount of hail damage, but the district court must determine whether any portion of that amount is excluded or limited by the policy, including exclusions for prior deterioration and defective shingles under the anticoncurrent-cause provision.
- Walnut Creek was not entitled to additional sums for soft-metal damage because it had not shown that the damaged property was actually repaired or replaced as required for replacement-cost payment.
Questions Presented
- Whether insurance appraisers may determine the factual cause of damage to insured property when determining the amount of loss from a covered storm event.
- Whether the district court could disregard the appraisal award and independently determine that the shingles sustained no hail damage.
- Whether coverage questions and policy exclusions, including an anticoncurrent-cause provision and exclusions for deterioration and defective materials, remained for the court after the appraisal.
- Whether Walnut Creek was entitled to additional payment for soft-metal damage under the policy's replacement-cost provision.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- Boelman v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co., 826 N.W.2d 494, 500 (Iowa 2013)(cited)
- Pudil v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 633 N.W.2d 809, 811 (Iowa 2001)(cited)
- Frunzar v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 548 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 1996)(cited)
- North Glenn Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty, 854 N.W.2d 67, 68-71 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)(followed)
- Quade v. Secura Insurance, 814 N.W.2d 703, 706-08 (Minn. 2012)(persuasive)
- Central Life Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 466 N.W.2d 257, 258-64 (Iowa 1991)(followed)
- Sager v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 680 N.W.2d 8, 13 (Iowa 2004)(cited)
- Postell v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 823 N.W.2d 35, 48-49 (Iowa 2012)(cited)
- National Surety Corp. v. Westlake Investments LLC, 880 N.W.2d 724, 733-34 (Iowa 2016)(cited)
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Brookwood, LLC, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1153, 1161-63 (N.D. Ala. 2017)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…