In re: PowerSchool Holdings, Inc., and PowerSchool Group, LLC Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

In re PowerSchool Customer Data Security Breach Litigation · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · April 18, 2025 · No. MDL No. 3149

Summary

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered centralization of actions arising from the PowerSchool customer data security breach. The Panel transferred the actions to the Southern District of California and assigned them to Judge Roger T. Benitez for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

Court
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Writing for the Court
Karen K. Caldwell; Nathaniel M. Gorton; Matthew F. Kennelly; David C. Norton; Dale A. Kimball; Madeline Cox Arleo
Jurisdiction
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decision date
April 18, 2025
Docket number
MDL No. 3149
Procedural posture
Plaintiffs moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize 32 related data-security-breach actions pending in three federal districts, along with related actions pending in additional districts.
Precedential value
transfer order
Parties
Plaintiffs in the Western District of Missouri J.J. action listed on Schedule A v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc., PowerSchool Group LLC
Disposition
other

Topics

class actionscivil procedurejoindernegligencebreach of contract

Practice areas

multidistrict litigationcivil proceduredata security litigationclass actions

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the actions involve common questions of fact warranting centralization under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
  2. Whether centralization would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
  3. Which federal district should serve as the transferee district.

Holdings

  1. The actions listed on Schedule A involve common questions of fact, and centralization will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
  2. The Southern District of California is an appropriate transferee district for the litigation.
  3. Informal coordination was not shown to be the most efficient means of resolving the litigation.

Factual background

The actions arise from unauthorized access to PowerSchool's Student Information System, which schools use to store personal information concerning current and former students and staff. Plaintiffs include students, students' guardians, and school staff seeking overlapping nationwide and statewide class actions. The actions assert virtually identical claims for negligence, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment, and discovery is expected to address the breach, PowerSchool's data-security practices, and its notification of affected individuals.

Procedural history

The Judicial Panel considered the papers filed and a hearing session concerning centralization of the litigation. The Panel found common questions of fact and ordered the Schedule A actions transferred to the Southern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, subject to that court's consent.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…