Summary
The Supreme Court of Kansas held that a district court lacks jurisdiction to modify a lawfully imposed felony DUI sentence after imposition absent statutory authority. The court concluded that the DUI statute's mandatory minimum language did not authorize sentence modification and reversed the Court of Appeals, affirming dismissal of the defendant's motion.
Holdings
- A Kansas district court has no jurisdiction to modify a legally imposed felony DUI sentence because neither K.S.A. 8-1567(f) nor the applicable sentencing statutes grants authority to do so.
- The exclusion of felony DUI from the sentencing grid and crime-severity-scale provisions does not preserve a general judicial power to modify the sentence after imposition.
Questions Presented
- Whether a Kansas district court has jurisdiction to modify a legally imposed sentence for felony DUI under K.S.A. 8-1567(f).
- Whether the statutory exclusion of felony DUI from portions of the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act preserves authority to modify a sentence after imposition.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (6)
- State v. Anthony, 30 Kan. App. 2d 427, 42 P.3d 207 (2002)(reversed)
- State v. Smith, 26 Kan. App. 2d 272, 981 P.2d 1182 (1999)(followed)
- State v. Miller, 260 Kan. 892, 926 P.2d 652 (1996)(followed)
- State v. Saft, 244 Kan. 517, 769 P.2d 675 (1989)(followed)
- State v. Bost, 21 Kan. App. 2d 560, 903 P.2d 160 (1995)(followed)
- Martindale v. Tenney, 250 Kan. 621, 829 P.2d 561 (1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…