Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 277 Kan. 551

85 P.3d 1183 (2004) · Supreme Court of Kansas · March 19, 2004 · No. No. 90,730

Summary

The Supreme Court of Kansas answered certified questions concerning whether Kansas recognizes a public-policy tort for retaliatory discharge of an employee who exercises rights under the Federal Employers Liability Act. The court held that Kansas law recognizes such a tort and that remedies available through Railway Labor Act arbitration do not constitute an adequate alternative remedy precluding the state-law claim. The opinion discusses Kansas's employment-at-will exceptions, public policy, collective bargaining agreements, and the adequacy of arbitral remedies.

Holdings

  1. Kansas law recognizes a common-law tort for retaliatory discharge based on an injured employee's exercise of rights under FELA.
  2. RLA arbitration is not an adequate alternative remedy that precludes a Kansas retaliatory-discharge tort claim based on exercising FELA rights.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Kansas law recognizes a tort action for retaliatory discharge when an employer terminates an employee for exercising rights under FELA.
  2. Whether remedies available through RLA arbitration constitute an adequate alternative remedy that precludes a Kansas retaliatory-discharge tort claim.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (27)

  • Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 266 Kan. 198, 967 P.2d 295 (1998)(followed)
  • Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893, 752 P.2d 685 (1988)(followed)
  • Riddle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 27 Kan. App. 2d 79, 998 P.2d 114 (2000)(followed)
  • Murphy v. City of Topeka, 6 Kan. App. 2d 488, 630 P.2d 186 (1981)(followed)
  • Petty v. City of El Dorado, 270 Kan. 847, 19 P.3d 167 (2001)(followed)
  • Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 242 Kan. 804, 752 P.2d 645 (1988)(followed)
  • Herrera v. San Luis Central Railroad Co., 997 P.2d 1238 (Colo. App. 1999)(followed by analogy)
  • Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246, 114 S. Ct. 2239 (1994)(discussed)
  • Garley v. Sandia Corp., 236 F.3d 1200 (10th Cir. 2001)(discussed)
  • Jarvis v. Nobel/Sysco Food Services Co., 985 F.2d 1419 (10th Cir. 1993)(discussed)

Showing top 10 of 27.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…