Kyle Anthony Burden v. Kentucky Bar Association

2016-SC-000114-KB · Supreme Court of Kentucky · May 18, 2016 · No. 2016-SC-000114-KB

Summary

The Kentucky Supreme Court approved a negotiated sanction under SCR 3.480(2) resolving disciplinary charges against Kyle Anthony Burden. The Court found that Burden practiced law while suspended for CLE noncompliance, publicly reprimanded him, and ordered him to pay $96.57 in costs.

Court
Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jurisdiction
Kentucky
Decision date
May 18, 2016
Docket number
2016-SC-000114-KB
Procedural posture
Burden moved under SCR 3.480(2) for approval of a negotiated disciplinary sanction resolving three pending disciplinary matters. The Kentucky Bar Association's Office of Bar Counsel agreed to the proposed disposition, which included findings of guilt and a public reprimand.
Standard of review
The Court exercises discretion under SCR 3.480(2) to approve an agreed negotiated disciplinary sanction or remand the matter for further proceedings.
Precedential value
Unknown
Parties
Kyle Anthony Burden v. Kentucky Bar Association
Disposition
approved

Topics

administrative lawagency adjudication

Practice areas

legal ethicsattorney disciplineprofessional responsibilityadministrative law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Court should approve the parties' negotiated sanction under SCR 3.480(2).
  2. Whether a public reprimand was an adequate sanction for Burden's admitted practice of law and representation of clients while suspended.

Holdings

  1. Under SCR 3.480(2), the Court has discretion to approve a negotiated disciplinary sanction when the member and Bar Counsel agree on the facts, rules violated, and appropriate sanction, or to remand the matter for further proceedings.
  2. A public reprimand was an adequate sanction for Burden's admitted violations of Rules of Professional Conduct 5.5(a) and 5.5(b)(2), notwithstanding his prior disciplinary history and the Court's concerns about his claimed lack of knowledge of the suspension.

Key quotations

Thus, acceptance of the proposed negotiated sanction falls within the discretion of the Court. (3)
Nonetheless, after reviewing the allegations, the admitted facts, and Burden's previous disciplinary record, this Court concludes that the proposed resolution of this matter is adequate, if imperfect. (5)

Factual background

Burden, a Kentucky lawyer, was suspended for CLE noncompliance beginning January 23, 2014, but continued appearing in court, representing clients, communicating with opposing counsel, and remaining counsel of record in several matters. He admitted the conduct underlying three KBA files and agreed that it violated Rules of Professional Conduct 5.5(a) and 5.5(b)(2). His prior discipline included a private reprimand, a probated thirty-day suspension, and the CLE-related suspension involved in this case.

Procedural history

The Inquiry Commission issued charges alleging that Burden practiced law and represented clients while suspended for continuing legal education noncompliance. Burden admitted the charged conduct and agreed with Bar Counsel to resolve the proceedings by public reprimand. The Supreme Court of Kentucky reviewed and approved the negotiated sanction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…