Summary
The Kentucky Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order denying immunity under Kentucky’s Stand Your Ground statute, KRS 503.085, in a civil action. The court concluded that the order did not satisfy the collateral order doctrine because it did not involve a substantial public interest that would be imperiled absent immediate review. The court vacated the Court of Appeals’ opinion and remanded the case to the Jefferson Circuit Court.
Holdings
- The Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction because the interlocutory order denying KRS 503.085 immunity to private defendants in a civil action did not satisfy all elements of the collateral order doctrine.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Kentucky Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order denying CR 12.03 motions asserting immunity under KRS 503.085 in a civil action.
- Whether the order denying the asserted immunity satisfied the three elements of Kentucky's collateral order doctrine.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (11)
- Wilson v. Russell, 162 S.W.3d 911, 913 (Ky. 2005)(followed)
- Hubbard v. Hubbard, 303 Ky. 411, 412, 197 S.W.2d 923, 923 (1946)(followed)
- Breathitt Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Prater, 292 S.W.3d 883, 886-87 (Ky. 2009)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Farmer, 423 S.W.3d 690, 693, 696-97 (Ky. 2014)(followed)
- Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (1985)(followed)
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 742 (1982)(followed)
- Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345, 352-53 (2006)(followed)
- Maggard v. Kinney, 576 S.W.3d 559, 566 (Ky. 2019)(followed)
- Hampton v. Intech Contracting, LLC, 581 S.W.3d 27 (Ky. 2019)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…