Summary
The Supreme Court of Louisiana resolved a split between the First and Third Circuit Courts of Appeal concerning the proper application of La. R.S. 14:81.1(A)(3) to multiple images of child pornography. The court held that a separate count may be charged for each child, in each performance, depicted in photographs or other visual reproductions intentionally possessed by a defendant. It reversed the Third Circuit's reduction of the defendant's sixteen convictions to one and reinstated the trial court's convictions.
Holdings
- La. R.S. 14:81.1(A)(3) permits a separate count and conviction for each child, in each sexual performance, depicted in photographs, films, videotapes, or other visual reproductions that the defendant intentionally possesses.
- A restitution order that does not specify the amount of restitution and the count or counts on which restitution is imposed renders the sentences indeterminate and invalid, requiring resentencing.
Questions Presented
- Whether La. R.S. 14:81.1(A)(3) permits a separate conviction for each child, in each sexual performance, depicted in visual reproductions of child pornography that a defendant intentionally possesses.
- Whether the trial court's nonspecific restitution order rendered the sentences indeterminate and invalid, requiring resentencing.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (28)
- United States v. Reedy, 304 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2002)(discussed)
- Bell v. United States, 349 U.S. 81 (1955)(discussed)
- State v. Joles, 492 So. 2d 490 (La. 1986)(discussed)
- State v. Kujawa, 929 So. 2d 99 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2006), writ denied, 938 So. 2d 65 (La. 2006)(followed)
- State v. Freeman, 411 So. 2d 1068 (La. 1982)(distinguished)
- United States v. Esch, 832 F.2d 531 (10th Cir. 1987)(discussed)
- Vineyard v. Texas, 958 S.W.2d 834 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)(discussed)
- State v. Mather, 646 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 2002)(discussed)
- State v. Multaler, 643 N.W.2d 437 (Wis. 2002)(discussed)
- State v. Schaefer, 668 N.W.2d 760 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003)(discussed)
Showing top 10 of 28.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…