McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp., 2002 ME 144

804 A.2d 406 (Me. 2002) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · August 27, 2002 · No. Cum-01-539

Summary

The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine held that an employer's proportionate share of settlement-related attorney fees and costs under Maine's workers' compensation lien statute must reflect both benefits already paid and future compensation liability relieved by the employee's third-party settlement. The court vacated the Superior Court's repayment judgment and remanded for calculation of the employer's share by comparing its full benefit from the settlement with the total settlement value.

Holdings

  1. Under 39-A M.R.S.A. § 107, an employer's proportionate share of attorney fees and costs arising from an employee's third-party settlement must be calculated with reference to both benefits previously paid and future workers' compensation liability relieved by the settlement, to the extent that future liability can be determined.
  2. The employer's proportionate share should be calculated by comparing the employer's full benefit from the settlement, including past benefits paid and the present value of future liability relieved, with the total settlement value.

Questions Presented

  1. How should an employer's proportionate share of the costs of an employee's third-party settlement be calculated under 39-A M.R.S.A. § 107?
  2. Does the employer's proportionate share include costs attributable to future workers' compensation liability relieved by the settlement, in addition to benefits already paid?

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (18)

  • Harding v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2001 ME 13, ¶ 9, 765 A.2d 73, 75(followed)
  • Russell v. Russell's Appliance Serv., 2001 ME 32, ¶ 10 n. 3, 766 A.2d 67, 71 n. 3(followed)
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Weeks, 404 A.2d 1006, 1008, 1013 (Me. 1979)(followed)
  • Dionne v. Libby-Owens Ford Co., 565 A.2d 657, 658 (Me. 1989)(followed)
  • Overend v. Elan I Corp., 441 A.2d 311, 312, 314 (Me. 1982)(followed)
  • Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Serv., 625 F.2d 314, 316 (9th Cir. 1980)(persuasive)
  • Stone v. Fluid Air Components of Alaska, 990 P.2d 621, 624-25 (Alaska 1999)(persuasive)
  • Cameron v. Minidoka County Highway Dist., 125 Idaho 801, 874 P.2d 1108, 1111 (1994)(persuasive)
  • Zuber v. Illinois Power Co., 135 Ill. 2d 407, Zuber v. Illinois Power Co., 135 Ill. 2d 407, 142 Ill. Dec. 871, 553 N.E.2d 385, 389 (1990)(persuasive)
  • Jones v. Melroe Division, Clark Equipment Co., 102 Ill. App. 3d 1103, 58 Ill. Dec. 934, 430 N.E.2d 1385, 1389 (1981)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…