Summary
The Maryland Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court for Montgomery County lacked personal jurisdiction over Realtime Gaming Holding Company, LLC and KDMS International, LLC in an action under Maryland's commercial electronic mail statute. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of minimum contacts and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying jurisdictional discovery or striking the amended complaint.
Holdings
- The existence of a website, without evidence of substantial, continuous, and systematic contacts with Maryland, is insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant.
- BSI failed to make a prima facie showing that Realtime Gaming and KDMS purposefully availed themselves of conducting business in Maryland or that an agency or contractual relationship connected them to windowscasino.com and the e-mail campaign.
- The circuit court did not abuse its discretion by denying BSI's request for discovery concerning personal jurisdiction.
- The circuit court did not abuse its discretion by denying reconsideration and striking the amended complaint because BSI introduced no new facts curing its failure to establish prima facie personal jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether Maryland could exercise general or specific personal jurisdiction over Realtime Gaming and KDMS based on their alleged Internet, software, and affiliate-related contacts with Maryland.
- Whether the circuit court abused its discretion by denying BSI discovery concerning jurisdictional facts.
- Whether the circuit court abused its discretion by denying reconsideration and striking BSI's amended complaint.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (21)
- Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Company, LLC, 384 Md. 448, 863 A.2d 997 (2004)(prior proceeding)
- Lamprecht v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 262 Md. 126, 277 A.2d 272 (1971)(followed)
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc., 334 F.3d 390 (4th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Christian Science Board of Directors of the First Church of Christ v. Nolan, 259 F.3d 209 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Mohamed v. Michael, 279 Md. 653, 370 A.2d 551 (1977)(followed)
- Geelhoed v. Jensen, 277 Md. 220, 352 A.2d 818 (1976)(followed)
- International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)(followed)
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997)(limited)
- Revell v. Lidov, 317 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Bancroft & Masters, Inc. v. Augusta National Inc., 223 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…