Summary
The Maryland Court of Appeals reviewed the Public Service Commission’s issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Dominion Cove Point LNG’s proposed electric generating station. The court held that conditions requiring payments to greenhouse-gas-reduction and low-income energy-assistance programs were valid regulatory measures rather than unauthorized taxes. It also held that the Commission made adequate findings regarding economic benefits and that substantial evidence supported its decision.
Holdings
- Conditions J-3 and J-4 were primarily regulatory measures, not taxes, and PSC had authority to impose them as conditions of the CPCN.
- PSC complied with its statutory obligation to state the grounds for its decision, and its findings did not deprive AMP of due process.
- Substantial evidence supported PSC's findings, and the Commission acted within its discretion in evaluating the available evidence concerning the generating station's economic impact.
Questions Presented
- Whether CPCN Conditions J-3 and J-4, requiring Dominion to make payments or contributions to Maryland energy-assistance and greenhouse-gas-reduction programs, were unauthorized taxes rather than permissible regulatory conditions.
- Whether PSC's failure to state a precise dollar amount or range for the positive economic benefits of the generating station violated statutory requirements or deprived AMP of due process.
- Whether substantial evidence supported PSC's findings concerning the generating station's positive economic impact.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (13)
- Accokeek, Mattawoman & Piscataway v. Public Service Commission, 227 Md. App. 265, 133 A.3d 1228 (2016)(affirmed)
- Hollingsworth v. Severstal Sparrows Point, 448 Md. 648, 654, 141 A.3d 90, 93 (2016)(followed)
- CWA v. Public Service Commission, 424 Md. 418, 36 A.3d 449 (2012)(followed)
- Easton v. Public Service Commission, 379 Md. 21, 30, 838 A.2d 1225 (2003)(followed)
- Cashcall & Reddam v. Commissioner of Financial Regulation, 448 Md. 412, 426, 139 A.3d 990, 998-99 (2016)(followed)
- Baltimore Gas & Electric v. Public Service Commission, 305 Md. 145, 170, 501 A.2d 1307, 1320 (1986)(followed)
- People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service Commission, 355 Md. 1, 14, 733 A.2d 996, 1003 (1999)(followed)
- Eastern Diversified v. Montgomery County, 319 Md. 45, 570 A.2d 850 (1990)(followed)
- Merchant v. State, 448 Md. 75, 100, 136 A.3d 843, 858 (2016)(followed)
- Sugarloaf v. Department of Environment, 344 Md. 271, 287, 686 A.2d 605, 614 (1996)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.