Commonwealth v. Jeiffry Rosario

Massachusetts Superior Court · May 23, 2025 · No. 2284CR00697

Summary

This memorandum resolves a defendant's motion to suppress a firearm and ammunition seized by police following a shots-fired incident tracked via ShotSpotter and surveillance cameras. The court determined that officers possessed reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory stop based on temporal and geographical proximity to the crime, matching physical descriptions, and immediate public safety concerns. Additionally, the court found the officers' show of force proportional and the subsequent protective sweep of the vehicle interior constitutionally justified. The motion to suppress is therefore denied.

Court
Massachusetts Superior Court
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts
Decision date
May 23, 2025
Docket number
2284CR00697
Procedural posture
Defendant's motion to suppress was denied.
Standard of review
reasonable suspicion and probable cause
Precedential value
non-precedential
Disposition
other

Topics

search and seizurefourth amendmentprobable causecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the stop of Rosario was a seizure supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause under Article 14 of the Massachusetts Constitution.
  2. Whether the frisk of the vehicle's interior and the subsequent search of the CR‑V were justified under Terry and the automobile exception.

Holdings

  1. The stop was a lawful seizure because the officers had specific, articulable facts—including proximity to the shooting, vehicle description, and matching physical description of the suspect—that satisfied the reasonable suspicion standard.
  2. The protective frisk of the rear passenger compartment was permissible as a Terry‑type sweep, and the discovery of the revolver gave officers probable cause to search the vehicle under the automobile exception.

Key quotations

"rather than focusing primarily on whether a reasonable person would have believed that he or she was free to leave, we look at the totality of the circumstances to determine whether a member of law enforcement has 'engaged in some show of authority' that a reasonable person would consider coercive; that is, behavior 'which could be expected to command compliance, beyond simply identifying [him‑or herself] as police.'"
"Taking appropriate precautions does not transform an investigatory stop into an arrest."

Factual background

On August 1, 2022, ShotSpotter detected gunfire near Washington Street and Columbia Road in Dorchester. Police reviewed surveillance video, identified a blue Honda CR‑V as the vehicle involved, and observed a Hispanic male matching the shooter's description inside the vehicle. Officers stopped the CR‑V, handcuffed the occupant, Jeiffry Rosario, and conducted a protective frisk of the rear passenger area, discovering a revolver and spent casings.

Procedural history

The defendant moved to suppress a firearm seized during an investigatory stop. The Superior Court analyzed the reasonableness of the stop and the scope of the subsequent frisk and held both lawful, denying the motion.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…