Summary
The Minnesota Court of Appeals considered whether a surviving adult child was totally disabled under Minn. Stat. § 256B.15, thereby preventing Faribault County from recovering Medicaid benefits from the decedent's estate. The court held that the unrebutted medical evidence established total disability and that the child's prior voluntary retirement was irrelevant. The court reversed the judgment allowing the County's claim, concluding that the statute did not authorize partial recovery.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether Robert Peck was totally disabled within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 256B.15 (1984).
- Whether Robert's voluntary retirement and withdrawal from the labor market made him ineligible to be considered totally disabled under § 256B.15.
- Whether, even if Robert was totally disabled, Faribault County could recover a prorated portion of its Medicaid claim from the Estate.
Holdings
- Robert Peck was totally disabled because his unrebutted physical and mental impairments rendered him unable to engage in any substantial gainful work activity.
- Robert's retirement five years before the decedent's death and the filing of the County's claim was irrelevant to determining whether he was totally disabled under § 256B.15.
- The County was not entitled to prorated recovery based on Robert's share of the Estate; because Robert was a totally disabled surviving child, the County's claim was disallowed in full.
Key quotations
“We therefore reverse the trial court's conclusion that Robert is not totally disabled.” (416 N.W.2d at 161)
“The testimony clearly shows, without contradiction, that Robert is unable to work because of his physical and mental disabilities.” (416 N.W.2d at 161)
“The state statute is clear, however, and it does not provide for such partial recovery.” (416 N.W.2d at 161)
Factual background
Emmaline Peck died on March 5, 1985, and her will was admitted to informal probate. Faribault County sought recovery of approximately $22,000 in Medicaid benefits it had provided to Peck. The County's recovery depended on whether Peck had a surviving child who was totally disabled. Robert Peck, age 72, had multiple serious medical conditions, including inner-ear disease causing falls and dizziness, chronic obstructive lung disease, severe hearing loss, diabetes-related neurological and visual problems, and slow mentation. His physician testified without contradiction that he was incapable of engaging in any substantial gainful work activity, although Robert had retired voluntarily in 1980 and had not sought work afterward.
Procedural history
Emmaline Peck's will was admitted to informal probate. Faribault County filed a claim against the Estate for Medicaid benefits, and after the Estate denied the claim, the County petitioned the trial court for allowance. Following an evidentiary hearing concerning whether Peck's surviving son, Robert Peck, was totally disabled, the trial court allowed the County's claim. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed.