Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court held that justice courts and circuit courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil actions involving more than $200 but not more than $2,500. The court affirmed the denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Mississippi justice courts and circuit courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil actions in which the amount in controversy exceeds $200 but does not exceed $2,500, unless the Legislature explicitly provides otherwise.
- The circuit court correctly denied the Arants' motion to dismiss because the Hubbards' $871.85 claim could properly be brought in either justice court or circuit court.
Questions Presented
- Whether Mississippi justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction, or share concurrent jurisdiction with circuit courts, over civil cases in which the amount in controversy exceeds $200 but does not exceed $2,500.
- Whether the circuit court properly denied the Arants' motion to dismiss.
Disposition
affirmed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (11)
- Lofton v. United States, 785 So. 2d 287, 289 (Miss. 2001)(followed)
- Chamberlin v. City of Hernando, 716 So. 2d 596, 601 (Miss. 1998)(followed)
- Clark v. State ex rel. Miss. State Med. Ass'n, 381 So. 2d 1046, 1048 (Miss. 1980)(followed)
- T.C. Fuller Plywood Co. v. Moffett, 231 Miss. 382, 388, 95 So. 2d 475, 478 (1957)(followed)
- Roberts v. Miss. Republican Party State Exec. Comm., 465 So. 2d 1050, 1051-52 (Miss. 1985)(followed)
- Brown v. McCoy, 362 So. 2d 186, 189 (Miss. 1978)(followed)
- Crane v. Reeder, 28 Mich. 527 (1874)(adopted)
- Daou v. Harris, 139 Ariz. 353, 678 P.2d 934, 937-38 (1984)(adopted)
- Seward v. Dogan, 198 Miss. 419, 436, 21 So. 2d 292, 294 (1945)(followed)
- Cumberland Tel. & Tel. Co. v. State, 99 Miss. 1, 11, 54 So. 446, 448 (1911)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…