Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the defendants in a wrongful-death action arising from a child's drowning in an unattended swimming pool. The court held that the child was a trespasser and that the defendants' duty was limited to refraining from willful or wanton conduct, which was not established by the failure to repair a hole in the pool fence. The court also declined to address whether the recreation organization was a corporation or an unincorporated association because the trial court had not decided that issue.
Holdings
- Under Mississippi law, the defendants owed the trespassing child a duty to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring her; the failure to repair the fence hole did not constitute willful or wanton conduct.
- Summary judgment for the defendants was proper because the record presented no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants had no liability under applicable Mississippi law.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendants were entitled to summary judgment because their alleged failure to repair a hole in the fence surrounding the closed swimming pool did not constitute willful or wanton conduct toward a trespasser.
- Whether the defendants' status as a corporation or unincorporated association should be addressed on appeal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Adams v. Fred's Dollar Store, 497 So. 2d 1097, 1100 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
- Goodwin v. Jackson, 484 So. 2d 1041, 1042, 1045 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
- Ausmer v. Sliman, 336 So. 2d 730, 731 (Miss. 1976)(followed)
- Gordon v. C.H.C. Corp., 236 So. 2d 733, 734-36 (Miss. 1970)(followed)
- Skelton ex rel. Roden v. Twin County Rural Elec. Ass'n, 611 So. 2d 931, 937 (Miss. 1992)(distinguished)
- Beta Beta Chapter v. May, 611 So. 2d 889, 895 (Miss. 1992)(limited)
- Dry v. Ford, 238 Miss. 98, 117 So. 2d 456, 458 (1960)(limited)
- Yazoo & M.V.R. Co. v. Smith, 111 Miss. 471, 71 So. 752, 756 (1916)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…