Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court held that a settlement under threat of eminent domain did not constitute a sale under the billboard lease's termination provision. The court concluded that the lease was not terminated and that Eller Media had a compensable interest in the condemnation proceeding. It reversed the judgment requiring Eller Media to repay $42,000 and remanded for determination of the value of its compensable interest.
Holdings
- A condemnation settlement between the landowner and the governmental condemning authority did not constitute a sale under the lease's termination provision; consequently, the lease was not terminated.
- Eller Media had a compensable interest in the condemnation proceeding because its billboard was a structure adversely affected by the acquisition.
Questions Presented
- Whether a settlement under threat of condemnation constituted a sale under the terms of the lease.
- Whether Eller Media had a compensable interest in the condemned billboard structure and leasehold.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (8)
- Brown v. Miss. Transp. Comm'n, 749 So. 2d 948, 957-58 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
- State Hwy. Comm'n v. Hyman, 592 So. 2d 952, 957 (Miss. 1991)(followed)
- Morley v. Jackson Redevelopment Auth., 632 So. 2d 1284, 1291 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Knight, 882 So. 2d 85, 92 (Miss. 2004)(followed)
- Miss. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Taylor, 293 So. 2d 9, 10-11 (Miss. 1974)(followed)
- Eller Media Co. v. Miss. Transp. Comm'n, 882 So. 2d 198, 201, 204 (Miss. 2004)(distinguished)
- State v. Card, 413 N.W.2d 577 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987)(not followed)
- Lamar Corp. v. State Hwy. Comm'n, 684 So. 2d 601, 604 (Miss. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…