Summary
The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed convictions of Tracy Dixon and Jerry Lee Ford for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The court held that the evidence supported each defendant’s conviction for the cocaine each physically possessed, but not constructive possession of the cocaine possessed by the other defendant. It also held that the challenge to police expert testimony was procedurally barred because no contemporaneous objection was made. The convictions and sentences were affirmed.
Holdings
- The evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ford constructively possessed the 6.5 grams physically possessed by Dixon or that Dixon constructively possessed the 13.5 grams physically possessed by Ford. Mere association and presence in the same vehicle established physical proximity but did not establish dominion or control over the other defendant's cocaine.
- The evidence was sufficient to sustain Ford's conviction for possession with intent to distribute 13.5 grams and Dixon's conviction for possession with intent to distribute 6.5 grams. The amount and packaging of the cocaine, together with the officers' testimony, sufficiently established intent to distribute.
- The challenge to the admission of the police officers' testimony was procedurally barred because defendants did not make a contemporaneous objection at trial. No circumstances warranted plain-error review.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that each defendant constructively possessed the cocaine physically possessed by the other, so as to support convictions for possession of the combined twenty grams.
- Whether the trial court improperly admitted police officers' testimony concerning the value and packaging of the cocaine without qualifying the officers as expert witnesses, and whether the issue could be reviewed as plain error despite the absence of a contemporaneous objection.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (23)
- Dixon v. State, 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 434 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006)(reversed in part)
- Johnson v. State, 904 So. 2d 162, 166 (Miss. 2005)(followed)
- McClain v. State, 625 So. 2d 774, 778 (Miss. 1993)(followed)
- Carr v. State, 208 So. 2d 886, 889 (Miss. 1968)(followed)
- Berry v. State, 652 So. 2d 745, 748, 750-51 (Miss. 1995)(followed)
- Wolf v. State, 260 So. 2d 425, 432 (Miss. 1972)(followed)
- Curry v. State, 249 So. 2d 414, 416 (Miss. 1971)(followed)
- Vickery v. State, 535 So. 2d 1371, 1379 (Miss. 1988)(followed)
- Hamburg v. State, 248 So. 2d 430, 432-33 (Miss. 1971)(followed)
- Roberson v. State, 595 So. 2d 1310, 1319 (Miss. 1992)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…