Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Martha Moore, Administratrix of the Estate of Willie B. Moore, Deceased

Illinois Central · Supreme Court of Mississippi · May 9, 2006 · No. No. 2006-IA-00884-SCT

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court addresses an interlocutory appeal concerning the denial of Illinois Central Railroad Company's motion to dismiss for want of prosecution under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d). The court holds that the plaintiff's letters requesting that the case remain on the docket did not constitute sufficient action of record or establish good cause after nearly seven years of inactivity. The court reverses and renders, directing dismissal without prejudice.

Holdings

  1. Letters that merely request that a case remain on the docket, are not filed as an action of record, do not constitute a properly presented application to the court, and do not show good cause do not satisfy Rule 41(d)(1). To avoid dismissal, a party must file either an actual action of record or a motion seeking continuation of the case.
  2. The circuit court abused its discretion by denying Illinois Central's Rule 41(d) motion. Because Moore failed to take qualifying action of record or show good cause, the action was required to be dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court abused its discretion by denying Illinois Central's motion to dismiss for want of prosecution under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d).
  2. Whether letters to the clerk merely requesting that a case remain on the active docket constitute an action of record or a written application supported by good cause under Rule 41(d)(1).

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (19)

  • Box v. State, 437 So. 2d 19, 21 (Miss. 1983)(followed)
  • Cucos, Inc. v. McDaniel, 938 So. 2d 238, 240, 242, 247-48 (Miss. 2006)(distinguished)
  • Watson v. Lilliard, 493 So. 2d 1277, 1278-79 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
  • Mississippi Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Parker, 921 So. 2d 260, 265 (Miss. 2005)(followed)
  • Guidry v. Pine Hills Country Club, Inc., 858 So. 2d 196, 199 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)(followed)
  • Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 733 (1878)(limited)
  • Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 212 (1977)(overruled_authority)
  • Roebuck v. City of Aberdeen, 671 So. 2d 49, 50 (Miss. 1996)(followed)
  • Carter v. Clegg, 557 So. 2d 1187, 1190 (Miss. 1990)(followed)
  • Walker v. Parnell, 566 So. 2d 1213, 1216, 1218 (Miss. 1990)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…