Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Blount

63 So. 3d 453 (Miss. 2011) · Supreme Court of Mississippi · March 24, 2011

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court considered whether sureties on contractor tax bonds were entitled to notice of their principals’ tax audits and assessments. The court held that the sureties were contractually liable for the taxes, damages, penalties, and interest covered by the bond riders, and that the Tax Commission’s failure to notify the sureties of the audits did not violate due process. The court also concluded that the sureties were not taxpayers entitled to statutory notice of the underlying assessments.

Holdings

  1. The sureties were contractually liable for all taxes, damages, interest, and penalties that accrued to Mississippi under the bonds and tax riders, because the riders' language was clear and unambiguous and expressly covered those amounts.
  2. The Tax Commission did not violate the sureties' substantive or procedural due-process rights by failing to notify them of the principals' audits, assessments, or hearings before the principals' defaults.
  3. The sureties lacked standing to contest the alleged denial of notice and due process relating to the principals' tax audits and assessments because they were not the taxpayers whose statutory rights were allegedly violated.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Mississippi contract law permitted enforcement of the tax riders against the sureties for all taxes, damages, penalties, and interest assessed against the bonded principals.
  2. Whether the Tax Commission violated the sureties' substantive or procedural due-process rights by failing to notify them of the principals' tax audits, assessments, and hearings before demanding payment.
  3. Whether the sureties had standing as taxpayers or otherwise to challenge the lack of notice concerning the principals' tax assessments.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (16)

  • Miss. State Tax Comm'n v. Mask, 667 So. 2d 1313, 1314-1315 (Miss. 1995)(followed)
  • Miss. State Tax Comm'n v. Dyer Inv. Co., Inc., 507 So. 2d 1287, 1289 (Miss. 1987)(followed)
  • Bishop v. Currie-McGraw Co., 133 Miss. 517, 97 So. 886, 888 (1923)(followed)
  • State for Use and Benefit of Brazeale v. Lewis, 498 So. 2d 321, 324 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
  • Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Hewes, 190 Miss. 225, 199 So. 93 (1940)(followed)
  • Morgan v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 222 So. 2d 820, 830 (Miss. 1969)(followed)
  • U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Parsons, 154 Miss. 587, 122 So. 544, 549 (1929)(followed)
  • J.R. Watkins Co. v. Runnels, 252 Miss. 87, 172 So. 2d 567 (1965)(followed)
  • American Olean Tile Co. v. Morton, 247 Miss. 886, 157 So. 2d 788 (1963)(followed)
  • First Baptist Church of Oxford v. Hendricks, 107 Miss. 267, 65 So. 244, 245 (1914)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…