Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Intercontinental Engineering Manufacturing Corporation

Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Intercontinental Engineering Manufacturing Corp., 121 S.W.3d 531 (Mo. banc 2003) · Supreme Court of Missouri · December 23, 2003 · No. SC 85292

Summary

The Supreme Court of Missouri dismissed an appeal by landowners challenging a levee district commissioners' assessment of benefits. The court held that Missouri Revised Statutes section 245.130.4 authorizes appeals only concerning compensation for appropriated property or damages to prejudicially affected property, not the propriety of benefit assessments. The court concluded that it lacked appellate jurisdiction, while noting that separate relief might be available.

Holdings

  1. Section 245.130.4 authorizes appeals only concerning whether just compensation was allowed for property appropriated or whether proper damages were allowed for property prejudicially affected by the improvements; it does not authorize an appeal challenging the propriety of the commissioners' assessment of benefits.
  2. The absence of a statutory right to appeal does not necessarily foreclose the landowners from seeking relief in a separate action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether section 245.130.4, RSMo 2000, authorizes an appeal challenging the commissioners' assessment of benefits in a levee-district proceeding.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court of Missouri had jurisdiction over the landowners' appeal.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (13)

  • In re: Marriage of Werths, 33 S.W.3d 541, 542 (Mo. banc 2000)(followed)
  • Farinella v. Croft, 922 S.W.2d 755, 756 (Mo. banc 1996)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Gibbons, 80 S.W.3d 461, 465 (Mo. banc 2002)(followed)
  • Harrison v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co., 607 S.W.2d 137, 146 (Mo. banc 1980)(followed)
  • In re Yellow Creek Drainage Dist., 240 S.W. 203, 206 (Mo. 1922)(followed)
  • J.A. Bruening Co. v. Liberty Landing Levee Dist., 475 S.W.2d 125, 126 (Mo. 1972)(followed)
  • In re Tri-County Levee Dist., 42 S.W.3d 779 (Mo. App. 2001)(not followed)
  • In re Fabius River Drainage Dist., 35 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. App. 2000)(not followed)
  • N. Kansas City Levee Dist. v. Hillside Secs. Co., 268 Mo. 654, 187 S.W. 852 (1916)(not followed)
  • Birmingham Drainage Dist. v. Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co., 274 Mo. 140, 202 S.W. 404, 406 (1917)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…