Summary
The Supreme Court of Missouri held that the State failed to prove Timothy Shepherd was a habitual offender based solely on his certified Colorado driving record. The record did not establish that at least five prior Colorado convictions involved conduct qualifying as intoxication-related traffic offenses under Missouri law in effect when the current offense occurred. The court vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
Holdings
- A prior conviction qualifies as an intoxication-related traffic offense only if the conduct underlying it satisfied the applicable Missouri definition in effect at the time of the present offense for which the state seeks sentencing enhancement.
- For purposes of the applicable intoxication-related traffic offense definition, driving means physically driving or operating a vehicle and does not include merely being in actual physical control of a vehicle.
- When an out-of-state statute criminalizes both conduct that qualifies as an intoxication-related traffic offense under Missouri law and conduct that does not, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant's prior conviction arose from qualifying conduct.
- The certified Colorado driving record, standing alone, was insufficient to prove that at least five of Shepherd's seven prior convictions qualified as intoxication-related traffic offenses.
- The conduct underlying a prior out-of-state conviction need not also constitute a crime under Missouri law at the time of the current offense in order to qualify as an intoxication-related traffic offense, so long as it satisfies the applicable statutory definition of an intoxication-related traffic offense.
Questions Presented
- Which version of Missouri's intoxication-related traffic offense definition governs whether prior convictions qualify for habitual-offender sentencing enhancement?
- Whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that at least five of Shepherd's prior Colorado convictions arose from conduct qualifying as intoxication-related traffic offenses under Missouri law.
- Whether the conduct underlying a prior out-of-state conviction must also constitute a crime under Missouri law at the time of the current offense.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (20)
- Cox v. Director of Revenue, 98 S.W.3d 548, 550-51 (Mo. banc 2003)(followed)
- State v. Craig, 287 S.W.3d 676, 681 (Mo. banc 2009)(followed)
- People v. Swain, 959 P.2d 426, 430-31 (Colo. 1998)(followed)
- Brewer v. Motor Vehicle Division, Department of Revenue, 720 P.2d 564, 567 (Colo. 1986)(followed)
- State v. Coday, 496 S.W.3d 572, 576 (Mo. App. 2016)(overruled)
- State v. Gibson, 122 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Mo. App. 2003)(overruled)
- Draper v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 156 S.W.2d 626, 630 (Mo. 1941)(followed)
- State v. Schroeder, 330 S.W.3d 468, 475 (Mo. banc 2011)(followed)
- State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. banc 1933)(followed)
- State v. Collins, 849 S.W.2d 228 (Mo. App. 1993)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…