State of Missouri v. Timothy A. Shepherd

No. SC99081 (Mo. Apr. 26, 2022) · Supreme Court of Missouri · April 26, 2022 · No. SC99081

Summary

The Supreme Court of Missouri held that the State failed to prove Timothy Shepherd was a habitual offender based solely on his certified Colorado driving record. The record did not establish that at least five prior Colorado convictions involved conduct qualifying as intoxication-related traffic offenses under Missouri law in effect when the current offense occurred. The court vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

Holdings

  1. A prior conviction qualifies as an intoxication-related traffic offense only if the conduct underlying it satisfied the applicable Missouri definition in effect at the time of the present offense for which the state seeks sentencing enhancement.
  2. For purposes of the applicable intoxication-related traffic offense definition, driving means physically driving or operating a vehicle and does not include merely being in actual physical control of a vehicle.
  3. When an out-of-state statute criminalizes both conduct that qualifies as an intoxication-related traffic offense under Missouri law and conduct that does not, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant's prior conviction arose from qualifying conduct.
  4. The certified Colorado driving record, standing alone, was insufficient to prove that at least five of Shepherd's seven prior convictions qualified as intoxication-related traffic offenses.
  5. The conduct underlying a prior out-of-state conviction need not also constitute a crime under Missouri law at the time of the current offense in order to qualify as an intoxication-related traffic offense, so long as it satisfies the applicable statutory definition of an intoxication-related traffic offense.

Questions Presented

  1. Which version of Missouri's intoxication-related traffic offense definition governs whether prior convictions qualify for habitual-offender sentencing enhancement?
  2. Whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that at least five of Shepherd's prior Colorado convictions arose from conduct qualifying as intoxication-related traffic offenses under Missouri law.
  3. Whether the conduct underlying a prior out-of-state conviction must also constitute a crime under Missouri law at the time of the current offense.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (20)

  • Cox v. Director of Revenue, 98 S.W.3d 548, 550-51 (Mo. banc 2003)(followed)
  • State v. Craig, 287 S.W.3d 676, 681 (Mo. banc 2009)(followed)
  • People v. Swain, 959 P.2d 426, 430-31 (Colo. 1998)(followed)
  • Brewer v. Motor Vehicle Division, Department of Revenue, 720 P.2d 564, 567 (Colo. 1986)(followed)
  • State v. Coday, 496 S.W.3d 572, 576 (Mo. App. 2016)(overruled)
  • State v. Gibson, 122 S.W.3d 121, 130 (Mo. App. 2003)(overruled)
  • Draper v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 156 S.W.2d 626, 630 (Mo. 1941)(followed)
  • State v. Schroeder, 330 S.W.3d 468, 475 (Mo. banc 2011)(followed)
  • State v. Raines, 62 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo. banc 1933)(followed)
  • State v. Collins, 849 S.W.2d 228 (Mo. App. 1993)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Missouri Supreme Court